| |  | | | |  | |
April 5th, 2006, 11:53 AM
|
#21 | | Banned | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Bloodflame i love my DFI. i've built systems with Asus too and they aren't bad either. i hate PCChips/ECS though... had a board by each and they were crap! :P | WORD |
| |
April 6th, 2006, 03:15 AM
|
#22 | | Dedicated Member | | CPU: Intel e2160 @2.75GHz | | | GPU: eVGA 9600GT @ 750/1080 | | | RAM: 4GB DDR2 @450 5-6-6-18 | | | PSU: OCZ Powerstream 520w | | how come so many people have voted asrock :/
and how come i'm not surprised by the quantity of intel votes 
__________________ so like... who likes to game? |
| |
April 6th, 2006, 10:38 PM
|
#23 | | Golden Member | | CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3.5ghz | | | GPU: BFG 8800GTS OC 512MB | | | M/B: ASUS Maximus Formula | | | RAM: Corsair PC2-8500 2x1GB | | Ummm? Pardon me?
__________________ Jonathan
Let's face the obvious. Yesterday we were nerds. Today we're the cognitive elite. Let's conquer. - Chester G. Edwards 
<!-- System Specs are to the Left --> |
| |
April 6th, 2006, 11:10 PM
|
#24 | | Golden Member | | CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3.5ghz | | | GPU: BFG 8800GTS OC 512MB | | | M/B: ASUS Maximus Formula | | | RAM: Corsair PC2-8500 2x1GB | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Baton Ïîêóïàåì Á/Ó êàðòðèäæè [Canon E-16, Canon E-30, HP Q1339A, HP Q5949A, HP Q6511A, HP 92274A, HP Q2612A, HP Q2624A, HP Q5942A, HP C4092A, HP C6615d, HP 51645A, HP Q2613A, XEROX P8e/P8ex (113R00296), HP C4129X, HP C3906A, SAMSUNG ML-1210D3, HP Q2610A, HP C7115A, HP C7115X] â Ìîñêâå è ðåãèîíàõ.Ïî âñåì âîïðîñàì îáðàùàéòåñü ïî òåëåôîíó +79017829409 Íèêîëàé www: kartridzhej.nete-mail: kartridzhi@gmail.comicq: 7582810 | I don't understand. It just comes up as gibberish on my end.
Maybe it's just firefox, a different language, or an unsupported font perhaps?
Can anyone else read it? Is it just me?
__________________ Jonathan
Let's face the obvious. Yesterday we were nerds. Today we're the cognitive elite. Let's conquer. - Chester G. Edwards 
<!-- System Specs are to the Left --> |
| |
April 7th, 2006, 04:36 PM
|
#25 | | Banned | hmm i think that post was deleted :| |
| |
April 9th, 2006, 11:50 PM
|
#26 | | Dedicated Member | MSI loyal customer here
__________________ Main rig:
Core 2 Duo E8400
MSI P43 Neo-F V1.1
2x2048 PC2 6400 Kingston HyperX 1.85V
Diamond HD 3850 512 MB
Maxtor 500 GB Sata II 32 mB
LG DVD-RW Sata
Audigy SE
Antec Power Trio 550 watts
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Laptop: Dell Inspiron 6000 running windows 7 |
| |
April 11th, 2006, 07:29 PM
|
#27 | | Golden Member | | M/B: GA-X48-DS5 + Asus P5E | | | PSU: OCZ 700W + HIPER 580W | | hey jb and rest users of msi
here is some pics for you and all users of MSI mbos and grafic cards
configuration is:
1)AMD 3000+ 64bit
2)Giel ddr pc 3200
3)Msi K8N Neo v2.0 ....... (mbo)
4)Msi FX 5200 (lol)
5)Maxtor (dident look how big is it)
.....
and this pc is only 4 days old (there was no oc becose that guy dont know how to use internet or something else)
hehehehehehehe
this last pic is from bios
look wath hapend when you buy a MSI hehehhehehe
p.s.LOL hhhhehhehehehehehhe
Last edited by gen.Rage1991hrv; April 11th, 2006 at 08:55 PM..
|
| |
April 12th, 2006, 12:56 AM
|
#28 | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Shadow Lady and how come i'm not surprised by the quantity of intel votes  | Please don't confuse quantity with quality, otherwise that would mean that McDonalds makes the best food in the world, and that Britney Spears is an excellent singer
The main reason that Intel will score low in an enthusiast's forum like this one is because Intel motherboards are predominantly used by businesses - not geeks. There is a very good reason for this - they are the most stable boards you can get and they have an extremely low failure rate.
Have you ever used an Intel motherboard? They are not designed for overclockers and have fewer tweaking options, but they remain rock-solid. Just because not many enthusiasts use them doesn't mean they are not any good.
So I'm not surprised by the small quantity of Intel votes either, even though they quite possibly make the most stable motherboards with the best chipset you can get. |
| |
April 12th, 2006, 05:26 PM
|
#29 | | Banned | *sets an Intel Machine on fire just to watch it burn* |
| |
April 13th, 2006, 12:25 AM
|
#30 | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by squall_leonhart69r *sets an Intel Machine on fire just to watch it burn* | Hey I never said that their current processors don't run ridiculously hot, I just said their motherboards were stable!
Besides Intel's clock throttling is programmed to quickly fetch buckets of water if they are ever set on fire, so you wouldn't be able to do it anyway Squall  |
| |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2 | | |