| |  | | | |  | |
April 2nd, 2009, 08:54 PM
|
#1 | | Site Staff | What do you think of PhysX? Do you like it? if you don't... tell us why. |
| |
April 2nd, 2009, 10:59 PM
|
#2 | | Professional Member | | CPU: AMD Athlon x2 7850BE | | | GPU: Palit HD3850 512MBDDR3 | | | M/B: GigabyteGA-MA78GM-DS3H | | | PSU: Modecom Feel III 500W | | PhysX could be cool but...:
1. nVidia is the only owner of this "thing"
2. In this moment only crysis have realistic graphics and this game should have any physics engine. Do physics have sense when hair look like helmet and face like few cubes sorted into one face-like shape? I don't think so
3. This "thing" gives too big performance loss.
__________________ Take your own future in your own hands! |
| |
April 2nd, 2009, 11:06 PM
|
#3 | | Master of Disaster | | CPU: Phenom II x3 720 @ 3.4 | | definite waste of time, bring on havoc
__________________ *Over Sized Obnoxious Signature Here* |
| |
April 2nd, 2009, 11:27 PM
|
#4 | | (ಠ_ರೃ) | | CPU: 940 BE @ 3.62Ghz H2O | | | RAM: 2x2GB 1.1Ghz HyperX BE | | | PSU: Antec EarthWatts 500W | | Waste of time
__________________ ご自身の没落を見て、証人の終わり |
| |
April 3rd, 2009, 12:14 AM
|
#5 | | Dedicated Member | | GPU: 4870X2 with 9800GTX+ | | | RAM: 8 gb Corsair XM3 DDR3 | | I have an Ageia pcie 1x card that still keeps up pretty well. It does makes it nice in games like UT3 for us ATI users but is starting to show it's age. It's cool addition but not a must have. |
| |
April 3rd, 2009, 01:58 AM
|
#6 | | Dedicated Member | | GPU: Sapphire HD3850 512mb | | Its a waste of time,
I ran a PhysX game on my computer, I couldnt run it in more than 9 fps for these shitty effects that dont even look good, or simulate anything close to real physics.....
and my bro has a gtx 250 and i play them on his build,
they still look like shitty effects...
__________________ boo high prices. |
| |
April 3rd, 2009, 02:46 AM
|
#7 | | Master of Disaster | | CPU: Phenom II x3 720 @ 3.4 | | all the people voting "Must have it" are either nvidia employee's or fanboi's, either way i think they need a slap
__________________ *Over Sized Obnoxious Signature Here* |
| |
April 3rd, 2009, 04:00 AM
|
#8 | | Dedicated Member | Until it adds something essential or important to the game, it is nothing but crap.
Regardless of whether the wiggly bit of cloth hanging over there is accelerated or not, it still lowers FPS. And as such is a feature I don't want.
I think with time physx type acceleration will be supported by all hardware and DX or similar API and when that time comes the hardware and software will be further ahead that they can support using these accelerated physics sub-routines to aid in realism or accuracy of games, think similutors/shooters etc. |
| |
April 3rd, 2009, 08:03 AM
|
#9 | | cel rau | my view of this is that U can't have PPU inside the GPU on a single GPU card
the FPS loss is to big not to be noticed
__________________ 人は地獄を作った |
| |
April 3rd, 2009, 08:35 AM
|
#10 | | Golden Member | Quote:
Originally Posted by blindartist all the people voting "Must have it" are either nvidia employee's or fanboi's, either way i think they need a slap | LOL
I think there is a "meh" or at least a "blah" option missing in the survey. In absence of better choices, I went with "I guess it's OK".
__________________ ... what? |
| |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2 | | |