Go Back   NGOHQ.com / General / Surveys

Poll: What do you think of PhysX?
Poll Options
What do you think of PhysX?

Reply
 
Old April 8th, 2009, 09:47 PM   #41
Newbie

Posts: 10
CPU: CORE I7 940
GPU: GTX 285 TRI SLI
M/B: ASUS RAMPAGE XTREME II
RAM: 6GB DDR 3
PSU: 1100 ULTIMATE CM
Default

how many years will HAVOC REQUIRE TO BE ADOPTED BY DEVELOPERS?
YOU ARE FORGETTING THAT THE LIST OF PHYSX AND AGEIA TITLES IS HUGE!
OR YOU ARE SO NAIVE THAT YOU THINK THAT THERE WILL BE A PORT BETWEEN HAVOC AND THE EXISTING GAMES (with physx) to work together?
psefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 04:39 AM   #42
Master of Disaster
 

Posts: 1,838
CPU: Phenom II x3 720 @ 3.4
GPU: Radeon HD4870 OC
M/B: MSI 790FX-GD70
RAM: OCZ DDR3 4gb
PSU: OCZ 700w
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psefer View Post
how many years will HAVOC REQUIRE TO BE ADOPTED BY DEVELOPERS?
YOU ARE FORGETTING THAT THE LIST OF PHYSX AND AGEIA TITLES IS HUGE!
OR YOU ARE SO NAIVE THAT YOU THINK THAT THERE WILL BE A PORT BETWEEN HAVOC AND THE EXISTING GAMES (with physx) to work together?
You are forgetting that caps are lame and make you look like a angry kid.

You are forgetting that the list of physx titles is tiny and insignificant.

You are forgetting that havoc is much easier to develop on and much better implemented so I foresee developers jumping ship to havoc very quickly

You are forgetting that no one will bother porting this small insignificant ammout of physx capable games to work with havoc because no one cares and physx makes almost no difference in the games.
__________________
*Over Sized Obnoxious Signature Here*
blindartist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 06:00 AM   #43
Dedicated Member
 

Posts: 160
CPU: E6750
GPU: Sapphire HD3850 512mb
M/B: INTEL DP35DP
RAM: 4 gigs ddr2 @1066
PSU: Cooler Master 500w
Default

first off,

LOL at cryostasis AND psefer

that game blows, theres almost no physics in it,

and second Havok is the better choice,

PhysX is a crappy software run mod, that has horrible performance hits for things that Havok has done better, and will less performance hit


and third lol at "how much are they paying you"

some times i think nvidiots are paid to be stupid on forums too!
__________________
boo high prices.
dammit45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 09:28 AM   #44
Professional Member

Posts: 260
CPU: Q6600 @3.5Ghz
GPU: 3870X2
M/B: Foxconn X38A
RAM: 2Gb DDR2 @1117Mhz
PSU: Blaah
Default

From what little I've read/know Havok sounds really cool...first off it is going to be truly open working through opencl...also read that it is going to be able to load balance the physics between gpu and cpu...think that will be a great feature and help to eliminate fps drop....you can't call me biased as I've got an ageia ppu in my ati system... but physx is coming to a close......as closed as physx itself.
technogiant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 12:59 PM   #45
Newbie

Posts: 10
CPU: CORE I7 940
GPU: GTX 285 TRI SLI
M/B: ASUS RAMPAGE XTREME II
RAM: 6GB DDR 3
PSU: 1100 ULTIMATE CM
Default

ALL OF YOU WITH CARDS LESS 4870 SHOULDN'T BE TALKING ABOUT GAMING PHYSX AND DX10.1!
GET A GOOD CARD FIRST AND THEN HAVE THE MOUTH TO SPEAK ABOUT THEM!
OF COURSE YOU GET A SLOWDOWN WITH PHYSX ! YOU LIVE IN 19TH CENTURY !
A AND I FORGOT DROP ALL THE SINGLE CORE CPU'S TO TRASHCAN!
IT'S WERE THEY BELONG !
YOU KNOWN THE COMPUTER SHOPS HAVE TO SELL SOMETHING IN ORDER TO SURVIVE!
AND THOSE OF YOU ASKING HOW MUCH NVIDIA IS PAYING ME PERHAPS THEY SHOULD CONSIDER ALSO TO ASK MONEY FROM ATI SINCE YOU ARE ADVERTISING THEIR CARDS OR YOU ARE ALREADY BEEN PAID FROM ATI?
ALSO F..K DIRECTX 10.1 DIRECTX 11 IS ON THE WAY!
WHO CARES ABOUT ONLY 3 DIRECTX 10.1 GAMES?
AT LEAST PHYSX HAS MORE THAN ENOUGH TITLES ALREADY!
psefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 01:01 PM   #46
Golden Member
 

Posts: 708
CPU: C2Q 9400 2.66 GHz
GPU: Gigabyte 4870 512MB
M/B: Gigabyte X48 DS5
RAM: 2x2GB DDRII OCZ
PSU: Chiftec 550W
Default

LOL, again you go with your caps.

It's almost not fun to laugh at you. I feel like I'm mocking a retard.
__________________
... what?
mkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 01:32 PM   #47
(ಠ_ರೃ)
 

Posts: 934
CPU: 940 BE @ 3.62Ghz H2O
GPU: HD 3870x2 OC H2O
M/B: GA-MA790FX-DQ6
RAM: 2x2GB 1.1Ghz HyperX BE
PSU: Antec EarthWatts 500W
Send a message via Yahoo to Zamoldac
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psefer View Post
ALL OF YOU WITH CARDS LESS 4870 SHOULDN'T BE TALKING ABOUT GAMING PHYSX AND DX10.1!
.....
lol how come u talk about dx10.1 but u don't have hardware to back it up ? since u put it this way
__________________
ご自身の没落を見て、証人の終わり
Zamoldac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 02:10 PM   #48
cel rau
 

Posts: 1,126
CPU: Q9550@2.83Ghz
GPU: ATi HD 4870X2
M/B: GigaByte X38-DS5
RAM: 8Gb DDR2 1066Mhz
PSU: GigaByte 620W
Default

what does 4870 has to do with physx since ATi has no official support for it
also, havoc was used in games way before physx
__________________
人は地獄を作った
zme-ul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 02:11 PM   #49
Golden Member
 

Posts: 736
CPU: Q6600 @ 3.4 Ghz
GPU: 2 x 9800GX2
M/B: XFX 780i
RAM: 4096 Corsair 800 XMS2
PSU: Galaxy 850W
Default

After having it for a while now I guess its ok but..."blah" - and thats coming from a fanboy.

The thing is , its quite cool technology and its also nice to have something that other GPU users don't have - thats about it!

I was quite excited when Nvidia first took over but lets face it, its not really critical to enjoy good games is it? And I dont see many people wetting their pants in excitement..
__________________
"Anytime, anywhere".
Syncroneyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2009, 03:02 PM   #50
Master of Disaster
 

Posts: 1,838
CPU: Phenom II x3 720 @ 3.4
GPU: Radeon HD4870 OC
M/B: MSI 790FX-GD70
RAM: OCZ DDR3 4gb
PSU: OCZ 700w
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkey View Post
LOL, again you go with your caps.

It's almost not fun to laugh at you. I feel like I'm mocking a retard.
hahaha ditto, i dont think anything else needs to be added to that
__________________
*Over Sized Obnoxious Signature Here*
blindartist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Disclaimer - Top