ATi struggle in Crysis?

Unixlord · August 29th, 2008, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumo

lol i do not care about that... when the demo was out my gpu was too slow (as i had only an exchange till the new one arrived) and now i try to install the game and cant play - it simply wont start up (and finally i am not pissed - i just ignore the hardware-hungry beast, and go back play the games with more GAMEPLAY than graphics :P )

Finally someone making sense here. *thumbs up*

SpectatorX · August 29th, 2008, 11:28 AM

That's reason why i will always use amd/ati's gpus. Since today i had two radeons and two geforces... nVidia's cards always dissapointed me.

saikamaldoss · August 29th, 2008, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fastmix

Can you edit the profile of Grid to optimize it for ati?

Thanks

Ok i will do that.....

saikamaldoss · August 29th, 2008, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AfterLife

Games should be optimized for all graphics cards not a specific brand........bad nvidia bad and not to forget crysis , shouldnt they have tried to get the game working on all hardware which in turn would have increased their sales ???

When u design game.. u need lot of hardware support and they need help from G-card companies and the developer will have to do favors for the company.. and on top of everything.. people will not know that the game is optimized to perform better on the Gcard who Sponsored the developer.

Even today.. when they do benchmarking.. they use games which is optimized on nvdia and say ATI sucks... which is bad

saikamaldoss · August 29th, 2008, 12:47 PM

we cannot say... Nvidia cards are bad.. they are good.. but not better than ATI thats all.. but my problem is not that NVIDIA IS GOOD OR ATI IS GOOD

Games should be optimized for all graphics cards not a specific brand

My friend has a 8800GT 512 XXX alfa dog version and was getting better FPS in crysis and in some games.. i was worried that a year old card can beat my new card...

We tried 3DMark Vantage and even in that i found it was beating my card in two Features Test, Then i found the both the test was based on AGEA physx.. using physics and particals...

Got pissed then i tried oblivion and my card was far too gud to compair.. hmm then i started doing reserch with games.. and found all the games where Nvdida rocks are all tricks..

CSAA trick.. hate people cheating

Whitef0x · August 29th, 2008, 01:28 PM

lol, All means are allowed if you dont get caught. But in the end doesnt this mean that even when ati users get worse performance they have better image quality ?
At least in games that AA meddle.

Now, there is nothing wrong getting your gpu's optimized for games, I only wish that ati would do the same... and more.

**Regeneration** · August 29th, 2008, 02:03 PM

This is some kind of old news since both firms are cheating for a long time. If you ask me, DOJ should sue them both for this lameness.

saikamaldoss · August 29th, 2008, 04:25 PM

but when they do benchmarking, they never worry about that right... hmmm

enzolt · August 29th, 2008, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saikamaldoss

we cannot say... Nvidia cards are bad.. they are good.. but not better than ATI thats all.. but my problem is not that NVIDIA IS GOOD OR ATI IS GOOD

Games should be optimized for all graphics cards not a specific brand

My friend has a 8800GT 512 XXX alfa dog version and was getting better FPS in crysis and in some games.. i was worried that a year old card can beat my new card...

We tried 3DMark Vantage and even in that i found it was beating my card in two Features Test, Then i found the both the test was based on AGEA physx.. using physics and particals...

Got pissed then i tried oblivion and my card was far too gud to compair.. hmm then i started doing reserch with games.. and found all the games where Nvdida rocks are all tricks..

CSAA trick.. hate people cheating

like i said architecture and a little bit of "magic"

saikamaldoss · August 29th, 2008, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enzolt

well during the development time, nvidia reigned supreme with 8800 g8x base chips like the 8800 ultra/gtx/gts. plus, TWIMTBP program is going on and since nvidia was THE card that a lot of people had, crytek decided to go with nvidia. and...most of it is marketing anyways. developers wouldnt put out a product if it "didnt work" for a certain type of market segment. crysis still works with radeons, just not as efficient. blame architecture.

So the Crysis two will be made to run on ATI better... m8 talk sense..