FX-62 Or X6800, your choice?

Locb · October 7th, 2006, 11:59 PM

I have no preferences over both Ati and Nvidia. Im just wondering which setup will provide more power, image quality etc.

Concept 5000-FX · October 8th, 2006, 01:50 AM

7950GX2 = SLI Quad

Locb · October 8th, 2006, 10:27 AM

Yes, I know Quad SLI provides more power etc, but Quad sli isn't really needed for most games right now. I have heard that CF provides better image quality compared to SLI.

gen.Rage1991hrv · October 8th, 2006, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locb

Yes, I know Quad SLI provides more power etc, but Quad sli isn't really needed for most games right now. I have heard that CF provides better image quality compared to SLI.

in future you will need quad sli so go with Nvidia
this would be my choice

Locb · October 8th, 2006, 05:43 PM

Thanks for the inputs, appreciate it

CoolZone · December 12th, 2006, 08:55 AM

i highly recommend the x6800

kYdizzle · December 12th, 2006, 04:45 PM

the X6800 and the 7950GX2 are my choice.

I like AMD, but the Core 2 architecture kicks any current AMD cpu

i just like Nvidia cards better than ATI

i would get the 8800GTX if i had the money.

xiaomhome · December 12th, 2006, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Regeneration

X6800 is much-much faster.

Agreed.

IModIntel · December 12th, 2006, 09:04 PM

Of course, even the benchmarks show that the Intel Core 2 Architechture is way better than anything that amd has done to date. Since I have always had an Intel/ATi combo, i've always been an Intel fan.

LinuxTech · December 24th, 2006, 04:19 AM

By far the Intel X6800 will give you better performance and you will be a able to upgrade to the quad core chip when their price drops. AMD's quad core chip will most likely require a motherboard upgrade.