 |
March 29th, 2005, 07:37 PM
|
#1 | | Guest | How much performance difference is there between a AMD Athlon 64bit 3200+ with L2 cache 512kb and the the same 3200+ with 1mb L2cache? | |
| |
March 29th, 2005, 10:05 PM
|
#2 | | Site Staff | Small for gaming and Medium for heavy applications |
| |
March 29th, 2005, 10:06 PM
|
#3 | | Guest | Thanks, seems i've got the right one | |
| |
March 30th, 2005, 10:38 AM
|
#4 | | Guest | AMD processor generally are less cache dependent than Intel's.
Thinking about the memory controller being incorporated directly into the CPU Ahtlon64s should be even less dependent, but I could miss some facts here. | |
| |
March 31st, 2005, 01:51 AM
|
#5 | | Guest | I think the difference between the two is the clock speeds and the cache and that the 1mb cache has slower clock speeds so if you have the 1mb cache, you can always OC the chip to the same clock spped as the other 3200 | |
| |
March 31st, 2005, 01:12 PM
|
#6 | | Guest |
You can see this !!! I'm french and this picture is taken of the most famous hardware site : Hardware.fr | |
| |  | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by
vBSEO 3.3.2