Athlon 3000 XP

March 11th, 2005, 02:49 PM

The 939 socket works faster, but the Hz is slower.. anyway the 939 is the new generation, so if you'r planning to get a new cpu, get this one. also search for some reviews of it, they looked up over it more closely so you can see every small different between those 2 sockets.

March 11th, 2005, 06:09 PM

i have question about the AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Winchester 92 Nm
its a good proccesor? what the 92 nm mean and will i fill it between the 3500+ regular?? :huh:

March 12th, 2005, 06:39 AM

Actually it 90 nanometer. It the size of transistor they use to make processor. It good because it in use socket 939

March 16th, 2005, 11:02 PM

The socket 939 has a evolution very poor, no ???

March 17th, 2005, 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Milousebw@Mar 16 2005, 10:02 PM
The socket 939 has a evolution very poor, no ???

No!

March 17th, 2005, 06:26 AM

Remember this "newer thing is better than old one". It like that in computer world

March 23rd, 2005, 05:55 PM

go with 939. Better compatablility for the future! and faster... and well.. better!

March 23rd, 2005, 06:34 PM

i agree with everyone, go with 939, they already quit making faster 754 pin A64's, they stopped at 3700+, 939 supports dual channel memory, 754 only single channel, higher bandwidth as posted before, from what i hear the 90nm overclocks a bit better than the 130nm chips and seems to run just slightly cooler.

definitely go 939

March 25th, 2005, 07:36 AM

id would of thought the big price differnece would of told u 64fx is better

Chimrod · March 31st, 2005, 12:11 AM

the 64 3000 754 is said to be faster (marginaly)
However i would go for the 939 as there are better upgrading possibilities