| |  | | | |  | |
August 13th, 2008, 09:48 PM
|
#1 | | Master of Disaster | | CPU: Phenom II x3 720 @ 3.4 | | q6600 or e8500 Ok so ive been looking at these two processors and am totaly drawn, they are both pretty much the exact same price, they are both good over clockers, the quad core solution is superior at rendering and some applications buat thats about it, from what ive been able to gather the e8500 outperforms the q6600 in more cases then not, the 8500 has better gaming performence, better perofrmence with some tasks (like filtering in photoshop), but the q6600 is obviously quad core, would be handy when havok comes out to have a core to dedicate to physics.
Like I said, I am completly drawn, would appriciate some opinions from you guys
Last edited by blindartist; August 13th, 2008 at 09:50 PM..
|
| |
August 13th, 2008, 10:04 PM
|
#2 | | Looking for a new start | | CPU: AMD Phenom II X3 720 B | | | RAM: 8GB OCZ DDR Reaper HPC | | I have not played with the e8500 but the Q6600 has worked well for me now for a few months |
| |
August 13th, 2008, 10:59 PM
|
#3 | | Stuck in "April 1st" | | M/B: Asus Rampage Formula | | | RAM: G.Skill 2x2GB PI Black | | Like I said, since you do rendering work the Q6600 is the right cpu for you (at that price range). I had to make a similar decision and went wolfdale because the lower temps, higher oc headroom and sheer single threaded muscle appealed to me. But if you're serious about rendering then either Q6600 or Q9300 will do.
Just remember there is no such thing as future proof and never has been.
__________________ IQ, when aggregated, follows Ohm's law.
Last edited by Unixlord; August 13th, 2008 at 11:03 PM..
|
| |
August 13th, 2008, 11:22 PM
|
#4 | | Master of Disaster | | CPU: Phenom II x3 720 @ 3.4 | | well the thing is i do also do photoshop work, and i enjoy gaming, the 9300 is appealing but a little out of my price range right now, damn desicions |
| |
August 13th, 2008, 11:26 PM
|
#5 | | Stuck in "April 1st" | | M/B: Asus Rampage Formula | | | RAM: G.Skill 2x2GB PI Black | | There's only half a multiplier's difference between E8400 and E8500. You could go E8400+aftermarket cooling and by the time you really need quads, the price of 45nm yorkfields will have dropped.
__________________ IQ, when aggregated, follows Ohm's law. |
| |
August 14th, 2008, 12:02 AM
|
#6 | | Professional Member | | RAM: 4GB G.Skill DDR3 1333 | | I am using a Q6600, it over clocks really well , having 2 extra cores is a bonus havent seen any program/game that take advantage of all 4 cores till now but I am sure it would come in handy later.
But I would have to agree with Unix above , you can go for e8500 and maybe later pickup the 45nm when the occasion calls for it. |
| |
September 5th, 2008, 08:04 PM
|
#7 | | Edelweiss Corporal | OMG another ads.
__________________ 
-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy------------------- |
| |
September 6th, 2008, 08:19 PM
|
#8 | | Spray 'n' Pray ! | | M/B: Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6 | | | RAM: 8GB OCZ AM2 DDR2-667 | | e8500 would have better performance in games than the Q6600 |
| |
September 8th, 2008, 08:11 PM
|
#9 | | Even Simpler | | CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | | | GPU: Nvidia GF9400+9600M GT | | | M/B: Apple MacBookPro v5.1 | | | RAM: 2x2Gb Samsung/Mac DDR3 | | | PSU: 85w MagSafe External | | Both not worthwhile. Go for a Phenom 9950 BE that is, if TDP doesn't matter to you.
__________________  AMD Phenom 2 X4 940 BE - ASUS M3A78-CM -Kingston HyperX DDR2-1066Mhz 4096mb - Enermax 535w - Antec Three Hundred Case - WD Caviar 120gb SATA - WD Caviar 320gb SATA2 - Samsung 500gb SATA - AMD Radeon HD4850 PCIE - ASUS Xonar DX PCI-E Sound Card - 2x LG DVD 20x SATA Burners - SilverStone FM122 HighFlow Side Panel Fan, 2x Antec Tricool LED front fans - 1 top + 1 rear Antec Tricool Fans |
| |
September 16th, 2008, 06:06 AM
|
#10 | | Master of Disaster | | CPU: Phenom II x3 720 @ 3.4 | | naw the 9950 is pretty much as fast as the q6600 @ stock but cant oc nearly as well, as much as i like amd, phenom is trash and they should have scraped it when the first release was a flop and made something decent. |
| |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2 | | |