 | |
June 1st, 2008, 06:25 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Buttkicker | | M/B: Asus Rampage Formula | | | RAM: G.Skill 2x2GB DDR21066 | | Lower the HT multiplier when raising the clock does not reduce performance. It prevents the HT from clocking too high and causing instability. On AM2, the HT link is never anywhere near saturated so even going slightly lower than 1000 has no performance impact.
AMD AM2 overclockers always lower the HT multiplier from 5x to 4/3x when overclocking this is a common and essential practice (otherwise you won't get higher clocks no matter what voltages you try) I don't know where you pulled that performance loss theory.
__________________ IQ when aggregated follows Ohm's law. |
| |
June 1st, 2008, 06:40 PM
|
#12 | | Golden Member | | M/B: GA-X48-DS5 + Asus P5E | | | PSU: OCZ 700W + HIPER 580W | | on a 4800 and msi mbo
maybe is mbo problem, do know |
| |
June 1st, 2008, 07:04 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Buttkicker | | M/B: Asus Rampage Formula | | | RAM: G.Skill 2x2GB DDR21066 | | 3800x2 should be able to manage 2.4GHz without any effort (I used to have one). It's the HT link being too high that's causing his problems. Yes it's probably because the MSI board can't endure a HT that high.
__________________ IQ when aggregated follows Ohm's law. |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced - Template by ForumMonkeys
Powered by vBulletin from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
LinkBacks Enabled by
vBSEO 3.1.0