Go Back   NGOHQ.com / Hardware / Overclocking, Cooling and Modding

Reply
 
Old March 14th, 2008, 01:16 AM   #1
Superiordealer
 

Posts: 1,870
CPU: E2160 1.8 @ 3.2 ghz
GPU: Gigabyte nV 9600 GT OC
M/B: Abit IP35-E
RAM: Geil Ultra 2x1Gb OC
PSU: Corsair HX520w
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Default Strange thing while OC`ing , help

Well I runned into strange thing why overclocking my new rig.

Fee things i need to explayn first .

First. My mobo is Abit IP35-E , it can eazly stand FSB up 500 , So it cant be why limits me.

Second thing. Memorys can run at 900 mgz with 4-4-4-12 timings.
I tested it , Perfect stable , lil higher voltage.
This sticks have cooling on them so not temp. problem.

And same for PSU and Cooling , its Katana 2 , temps never gone more that 50 at full load.

Now i gonna give you 3 sets of Bios. And after this i explayn the rest.

FSB = 300
Multi. = 9x
CPU = 2.7Ghz
CPU:RAM : 1-1.5
DDR = 900mgz
Timings= 4-4-4-12

Ok that was the first OC that i did make , i did go strait to that becos i knowed that my system can run it with no problems.
I did raise one step both core and mem voltages.
The rig runs perfect stable at this set.
So i rised it higher and higher , when i runed into troubles.


FSB = 333
Multi. = 9x
CPU = 3.0Ghz
CPU:RAM : 1-1.25
DDR = 832mgz
Timings= 4-4-4-12

And at this set i got BSOD while system was loading. Or while stating up some app.
Well so i think i need more voltage on the cpu , i rise it one step.
Boot and still the same. rising voltages did have any effect on this.
And keep in minde this CPU can stand eazly 3.2 ghz.
I even set the CPU:RAM to 1:1 So the freg. for mems was very low.
Still BSOD.
And then i tryed one thing.
I lowered mem latencys to 5-5-5-15

And now its like this


FSB = 356
Multi. = 9x
CPU = 3.20Ghz
CPU:RAM : 1-1.25
DDR = 890mgz
Timings= 5-5-5-15

And this runs perfecly smoooth and stable. Temps at full load 48-52 C and lower.


The question is , why lowering latencys of memory given me muth higher OC ??
Remember that lowering memory speed dint have any effect.

Im must admit that im newbie with overclocking.
But i picked parts that shuld stand what i do with it.
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------

Last edited by nCaine; March 14th, 2008 at 01:21 AM.
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 02:16 AM   #2
Should I have an title?
 

Posts: 1,547
CPU: AMD Athlon X2 6000+
GPU: 2x ATI HD4850 PE
M/B: Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6
RAM: 8GB OCZ AM2 DDR2-667
PSU: Antec EarthWatts 500W
Send a message via MSN to IModAmd
Default

Because ... when your latencies was too much high... so the system crashes... when you overclocked your cpu your memory was overclocked... so less voltage for the latencies... then stay at thoses latencies and all will be fine... if you want to put the latencies at 4-4-4-12... give it more voltage... but don't go too much higher of your Voltage Protection Or the warrenty of your modules will be finish
__________________




IModAmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 02:44 AM   #3
Superiordealer
 

Posts: 1,870
CPU: E2160 1.8 @ 3.2 ghz
GPU: Gigabyte nV 9600 GT OC
M/B: Abit IP35-E
RAM: Geil Ultra 2x1Gb OC
PSU: Corsair HX520w
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IModAmd View Post
Because ... when your latencies was too much high... so the system crashes... when you overclocked your cpu your memory was overclocked... so less voltage for the latencies... then stay at thoses latencies and all will be fine... if you want to put the latencies at 4-4-4-12... give it more voltage... but don't go too much higher of your Voltage Protection Or the warrenty of your modules will be finish

IModAmd , that what you write is perfect clear , but I LOWERED the CPURAM to 1:1 , this makes ram run at 600 mgz if i remember good why cpu is at 3.0 . So as you see i did maintain it at safe freg.

hmm maybe its my bad english.
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 02:50 AM   #4
Should I have an title?
 

Posts: 1,547
CPU: AMD Athlon X2 6000+
GPU: 2x ATI HD4850 PE
M/B: Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6
RAM: 8GB OCZ AM2 DDR2-667
PSU: Antec EarthWatts 500W
Send a message via MSN to IModAmd
Default

sorry bro :S ... getting tired....
__________________




IModAmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 02:55 AM   #5
Superiordealer
 

Posts: 1,870
CPU: E2160 1.8 @ 3.2 ghz
GPU: Gigabyte nV 9600 GT OC
M/B: Abit IP35-E
RAM: Geil Ultra 2x1Gb OC
PSU: Corsair HX520w
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IModAmd View Post
sorry bro :S ... getting tired....
Chill mate , its a late time post for me to , lots of gramma miss , but thats normal for me cos i never got even one hour of english lesson , i learned it myself .
I happy with this OC , but i want know what can be the problem befor i push it more.
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 03:06 AM   #6
Should I have an title?
 

Posts: 1,547
CPU: AMD Athlon X2 6000+
GPU: 2x ATI HD4850 PE
M/B: Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6
RAM: 8GB OCZ AM2 DDR2-667
PSU: Antec EarthWatts 500W
Send a message via MSN to IModAmd
Default

Welll bro you're starting to have an nice rig
__________________




IModAmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 09:33 PM   #7
Golden Member

Posts: 393
CPU: Athlon64 3200+
GPU: MSI nVidia 6800 Ultra
M/B: Asus A8V-Deluxe
RAM: 1GB (2x512MB)
PSU: 460W Akasa Pax
Send a message via MSN to xiaomhome
Default

Lower frequencies requires less work from the latency of your memory sticks.
Thats why they get more stable when you lower the frequency and rise the latency.

"When the memories are transporting less data(600MHz) it doesnt need to have high latencies because its transporting small "amount" of data, but when it is running at 1 GHz it requires more latency to complete the work".
I quoted that because that "explanation" is not 100% correct, there are more tecnical explanations out there, but thats mine quick and easy to understand explanation.
__________________
Live Chat in NGOHQ - http://www.ngohq.com/misc.php?do=flashchat
EasyBlock Interface for linux - http://www.ngohq.com/general-softwar...ock-linux.html
New project page: - http://sourceforge.net/projects/easyblockinterf/
Are you a linux user? http://counter.li.org/ - Get counted.
Need help with linux? http://www.ngohq.com/showthread.php?t=9370

Last edited by xiaomhome; March 14th, 2008 at 09:39 PM.
xiaomhome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14th, 2008, 10:52 PM   #8
Superiordealer
 

Posts: 1,870
CPU: E2160 1.8 @ 3.2 ghz
GPU: Gigabyte nV 9600 GT OC
M/B: Abit IP35-E
RAM: Geil Ultra 2x1Gb OC
PSU: Corsair HX520w
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Default

I thinked about some like that.
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22nd, 2008, 11:37 AM   #9
Superiordealer
 

Posts: 1,870
CPU: E2160 1.8 @ 3.2 ghz
GPU: Gigabyte nV 9600 GT OC
M/B: Abit IP35-E
RAM: Geil Ultra 2x1Gb OC
PSU: Corsair HX520w
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Talking

Hehhehe i pushed it even more.

I found out that lowering the CPU to 3.2 alow me to get very high with the ram.

So now its like this :



FSB = 356
Multi. = 9x
CPU = 3.20Ghz
CPU:RAM : 1-1.50
DDR = 1067mgz (the rams are 800mhz nominal)
Timings= 5-5-5-15


the extra 200 mhz on the ram , boosted the performance big time. And the Geil`s are only warm not hot , after 5 hours of mem test , No errors detected. Same with normal usage of the rig , no crashes , or BSOD.


But the sad part is that i picked too slow rams , i gonna swith this one to the same Geil Ultra but with higher freg. and push them more.
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------

Last edited by nCaine; March 22nd, 2008 at 11:42 AM.
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22nd, 2008, 12:22 PM   #10
Golden Member
 

Posts: 2,800
CPU: Q9450 + E8200
GPU: 3870x2 + 8800GTS
M/B: GA-X48-DS5 + Asus P5E
RAM: 4Gb S.T. + 4Gb OCZ
PSU: OCZ 700W + HIPER 580W
Send a message via Yahoo to gen.Rage1991hrv
Default

set it 1:1 and rise a cpu voltage and rise fsb so ram can go on 700-800 with 4-4-4-12
__________________
im principio erat verbum
et
Verbum erat apud Deum
et Deus
erat Verbum
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ-9oyyVXis&NR=1



gen.Rage1991hrv is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

ATI Radeon HD 4870 4850 3850 3870 2900 2600 NVIDIA GeForce 280 260 9800 9600 8800 8600 - NGOHQ.com





eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced - Template by ForumMonkeys
Powered by vBulletin from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Privacy Policy & Disclaimer - Top