Go Back   NGOHQ.com / Software / Operating Systems

Reply
 
Old September 27th, 2006, 03:13 AM   #1
Golden Oldie Member
 

Posts: 2,151
CPU: Intel E6700 @ 3.2 GHz
GPU: HD 4770 512 GDDR5
M/B: MSI P45 Neo F (Rev. 1)
RAM: 8 GB Dual Channel DDR2
PSU: 1000W Ultra X3
Default What is Your Computer Performance Score for Vista?

Those who are testing Vista, I have a question for you: What does your computer score in the Performance tests?

To get to the score, go to the Start option and click on it.
Now, click on the Computer selection.
Then, click on the System Properties tab.
You'll now see a Windows Experience Index. There's an overall score there. Mine's 4.2

To get more details, click on the Windows Experience Index hypertext link. Here's what the details page should look like:
__________________
<-<-<-<-See Profile to the Left~~
Dyre Straits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2006, 04:22 AM   #2
Site Staff
 

Posts: 11,447
CPU: Intel Core i7-965
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770
M/B: Intel DX58SO
RAM: Mixed
PSU: X-Spice 630w
Default

Their rating system sucks big time. My system is better then yours (SLI, better CPU, more RAM and RAID0) and it’s giving me the same score.
Regeneration is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2006, 07:58 AM   #3
Golden Oldie Member
 

Posts: 2,151
CPU: Intel E6700 @ 3.2 GHz
GPU: HD 4770 512 GDDR5
M/B: MSI P45 Neo F (Rev. 1)
RAM: 8 GB Dual Channel DDR2
PSU: 1000W Ultra X3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regeneration
Their rating system sucks big time. My system is better then yours (SLI, better CPU, more RAM and RAID0) and it’s giving me the same score.

That's kind of why I'm asking. I wanted to see just how varied the scores are....or similar as the case may be.

Also, on RC1, my system actually scored a 4.3.
__________________
<-<-<-<-See Profile to the Left~~
Dyre Straits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2006, 11:11 PM   #4
Stuck in "April 1st"

Posts: 3,199
CPU: Intel E8400
GPU: Geforce 8800GT
M/B: Asus Rampage Formula
RAM: G.Skill 2x2GB PI Black
PSU: PCP&C Silencer 750w
Default

Is there any way to get this score without installing that piece of junk?
__________________
IQ, when aggregated, follows Ohm's law.

Unixlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2006, 11:48 PM   #5
Newbie

Posts: 19
CPU: Athlon64 3800+
GPU: Radeon x800XL 256mb
M/B: MSI RD480 Neo2
RAM: 2048mb PNY ValueRam
PSU: 650w Antec Truepower
Default

Actually no. My archaic system scored a 3.6 (edit: In RC1 and 5728):

Processor: 3.7
Memory: 4.2
Graphics: 3.6
Gaming graphics: 3.6
Primary Hard disk: 5.2

There's not much I can do to improve my score without a complete upgrade... if I change out my video card I'll just end up with a 3.7. This CPU is topped out, it's a Thorton core overclocked to it's highest capabilities, which means I'm pushing it to 333mhz FSB so I can achieve 2250mhz clock speed. It's originally an Athlon XP 2200+ which means it was originally 1.8ghz. A 450mhz gain on such an old CPU is amazing, but I can't do much more. I'd have to do at least a Pentium-D 805 to get any real, beneficial performance increase. I could go single-core A64 but single-core is going the way of the 486 VERY soon, everything is gonna be multi-core within the next few years.
Treehumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2006, 12:08 AM   #6
Professional Member
 

Posts: 295
CPU: Intel i7 920@ 4.0 TRUE
GPU: Powercolor HD5870
M/B: Gigabyte EX58 UD5
RAM: OCZ 6GB DDR3 1900mhz
PSU: Thermaltake TP 1200W
Default

Yeah that Vista Perf Score is really worthless. It doesnt even differentiate between 2.4ghz Core 2 Duo CPu and 2.4Ghz AMD X2 Cpu. Ofcourse the C2D should score higher, but it doesnt. So dont put so much care to that number, its really bad n sux.
__________________
Intel Core i7 920@4.0||Gigabyte EX-UD5||OCZ 6GB DDR3@1800mhz 9-9-9-27CR1||Powercolor HD5870@default||X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro||Thermaltake ToughPower 1200W PSU||Silverstone TJ-09B||FUJITSU AMILO SL 3260W 26" LCD @1920x1200||Logitech G15||Razer DeathAdder||2x Samsung 500GB@Raid0||2x WD Raptor 36gb@Raid0||Seagate 500GB 32mb Cache SataII||TRUE 120 w/Noctua 120mm Fan||+ a HTPC & LG LCD 37"||
HaZe303 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2006, 12:15 AM   #7
Newbie

Posts: 19
CPU: Athlon64 3800+
GPU: Radeon x800XL 256mb
M/B: MSI RD480 Neo2
RAM: 2048mb PNY ValueRam
PSU: 650w Antec Truepower
Default

As far as ratings go I only trust real-world performance... Show me the CPU being used in every day applications such as video encoding, games, and file compression/decompression and I'll believe the scores you tell me. This Performance in Vista score thingy? Worthless.
Treehumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2006, 03:34 PM   #8
Stuck in "April 1st"

Posts: 3,199
CPU: Intel E8400
GPU: Geforce 8800GT
M/B: Asus Rampage Formula
RAM: G.Skill 2x2GB PI Black
PSU: PCP&C Silencer 750w
Default

You'll be lucky if 20% of games for the next few years really benefit from 2 cores.
__________________
IQ, when aggregated, follows Ohm's law.

Unixlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2006, 09:48 PM   #9
Professional Member
 

Posts: 295
CPU: Intel i7 920@ 4.0 TRUE
GPU: Powercolor HD5870
M/B: Gigabyte EX58 UD5
RAM: OCZ 6GB DDR3 1900mhz
PSU: Thermaltake TP 1200W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unixlord
You'll be lucky if 20% of games for the next few years really benefit from 2 cores.
About that? I think youre wrong... We already beginning to see an increase. Now with 4 core cpu´s coming people are starting to demand it. And with both the new Next gen consoles out, the game developers are starting to get better at programming in multi thread. Take in example "Alan Wake", you cant play the game without a dualcore, same i think with Crysis. So i think there will be an significant increase in "multithreaded" application/games programming in these upcoming years...
__________________
Intel Core i7 920@4.0||Gigabyte EX-UD5||OCZ 6GB DDR3@1800mhz 9-9-9-27CR1||Powercolor HD5870@default||X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro||Thermaltake ToughPower 1200W PSU||Silverstone TJ-09B||FUJITSU AMILO SL 3260W 26" LCD @1920x1200||Logitech G15||Razer DeathAdder||2x Samsung 500GB@Raid0||2x WD Raptor 36gb@Raid0||Seagate 500GB 32mb Cache SataII||TRUE 120 w/Noctua 120mm Fan||+ a HTPC & LG LCD 37"||
HaZe303 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2006, 10:43 PM   #10
Stuck in "April 1st"

Posts: 3,199
CPU: Intel E8400
GPU: Geforce 8800GT
M/B: Asus Rampage Formula
RAM: G.Skill 2x2GB PI Black
PSU: PCP&C Silencer 750w
Default

Quote:
About that? I think youre wrong... We already beginning to see an increase. Now with 4 core cpu´s coming people are starting to demand it. And with both the new Next gen consoles out, the game developers are starting to get better at programming in multi thread. Take in example "Alan Wake", you cant play the game without a dualcore, same i think with Crysis. So i think there will be an significant increase in "multithreaded" application/games programming in these upcoming years...
That's what they want you to believe. So you go out and buy buy buy and keep buying just to have a few scripts run on the other core. I'm on dual core and non of the multithreaded games I've tried use both cores at maximum. You're just another zombified consumer. Enjoy.
__________________
IQ, when aggregated, follows Ohm's law.

Unixlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Disclaimer - Top