Go Back   NGOHQ.com / Software / Operating Systems

Reply
 
Old March 15th, 2006, 07:06 PM   #1
Site Staff
 

Posts: 11,449
CPU: Intel Core i7-965
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770
M/B: Intel DX58SO
RAM: Mixed
PSU: X-Spice 630w
Default Vista - What do you think so far?

You probably read a lot about Microsoft's upcoming OS. What you think about it so far?

Last edited by Regeneration; March 15th, 2006 at 11:22 PM..
Regeneration is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2006, 07:30 PM   #2
Professional Member
 

Posts: 435
CPU: Athlon 64 X2 6400+
GPU: Radeon HD2900 XT 512mb
M/B: Asus M3A
RAM: 2Gb Geil DDR2 PC8500
PSU: FSP Epsilon 700W
Default

It`s obviously going to be big and bloated, that we know for a fact, witch means that
the hardware producers are going to get rich when Microsoft releases Vista,
coincidental? I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist but i have thought about it.
Vista isn't really breaking any new ground, despite what Gates say it`s only a remake
of previous windows versions and have much of the same shortcomings, it demands
a lot of resources when doing absolutely nothing, it probably has a long boot time on
"non cutting ege" computers, Vista has an ounce of unnecessary services running in the
background using memory better used for 3rd party programs like Office apps, Games etc.
so even if you're just an "Office rat" you still need some serious computer power to run Vista properly.
We`ll have to wait and see if the final product has anything to show for other than fancy looks...
__________________
"What if a demon were to creep after you one night, in your loneliest loneliness, and say, 'This life which you live must be lived by you once again and innumerable times more; and every pain and joy and thought and sigh must come again to you, all in the same sequence. The eternal hourglass will again and again be turned and you with it, dust of the dust!' Would you throw yourself down and gnash your teeth and curse that demon? Or would you answer, 'Never have I heard anything more divine?"

Last edited by Zandro; March 15th, 2006 at 08:34 PM..
Zandro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2006, 07:47 PM   #3
Edelweiss Corporal
 

Posts: 2,190
CPU: Celeron 2.53 ghz
GPU: LGA some shit
M/B: dunno dont care
RAM: Geil Ultra 1x1Gb
PSU: dunno
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Cool

I dont read muth of Vista , but heard fee things.

Of course you right Zandro , If my games gonna work slower and crapier on Vista that on XP , then fuck it , i reale want to see some benefits from new system , MORE STABLE , FASTER , LESS CPU&MEMORY usage.

And i dont wanna "BETTER" system with 1000 fountains in it , 3d desktop ( WHY THE FUCK WE NEED 3D desktops for ) and alot , cpary shit that i never gona use in my life .


But the sadest thig is if we want it or dont want at some point we all gona have to swith to it , hope its not too early .
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2006, 08:46 PM   #4
Dedicated Member

Posts: 133
CPU: Pentium D805 @ 3.95
GPU: eVGA 7900GT KO
M/B: ECS C-19A SLI
RAM: Corsair 2GB Value
PSU: Ultra X2 Connect 550W
Default

I guess you are ncaine.
I don't give a s*&) if my desktop is in 3d I only need my games in 3d.
If we are going to have to switch...i'm not sure I might still be using XP in a few years who knows.
I mean look at what happened to windows64.
No home users actualy ever used it.
(Or maybe you did... I did for a while until I realised that it wasn't worth it and that games that were supposed to run faster were running slower...)
Mastamune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2006, 09:04 PM   #5
Edelweiss Corporal
 

Posts: 2,190
CPU: Celeron 2.53 ghz
GPU: LGA some shit
M/B: dunno dont care
RAM: Geil Ultra 1x1Gb
PSU: dunno
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Angry

WELL its like this NEW operating system shuld be "BETTER" , we all can say YES to this.

But "BETTER" in our heads , its some totaly other that "BETTER" in the heads of Microsoft staff , and that guy ... what was his name .... aaaa BILL.

So we now gonna get "better" system , and next we gonna have to get "better" hardware for it , and then our games gonna run just like they run now on XP , WOOOOOHOOOOOOOO

This is what make the world go around.

PS. I never used windows64.
PS2. Even the 64 version of Half Life work slower that normal 32 xp version , so what you make of that. I know its just getting started , shuld we move foward not back.
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------

Last edited by nCaine; March 15th, 2006 at 09:08 PM..
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2006, 11:04 PM   #6
Golden Member
 

Posts: 547
CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3.5ghz
GPU: BFG 8800GTS OC 512MB
M/B: ASUS Maximus Formula
RAM: Corsair PC2-8500 2x1GB
PSU: OCZ EvoStream 720W
Send a message via MSN to jbruneau Send a message via Yahoo to jbruneau
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nCaine
PS2. Even the 64 version of Half Life work slower that normal 32 xp version , so what you make of that. I know its just getting started , shuld we move foward not back.
I'm not trying to start a flaming war here, just hear me out.

The 64bit version of the game DOES run slower, but that is because of the visual enhancements that have been added to the game over the 32bit version! All of these enhancements obviously tax the system much more . This applies true to all 64bit ready games, like: FarCry, HL2, Chronicles of Riddick, UnrealTournament 2006, etc.

In all honesty, a 32bit game runs the same speed regardless of whether it is in a 32bit or 64bit o/s! If you want to look at the review at AnandTech (a very highly regarded site): http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2411&p=3.
__________________
Jonathan

Let's face the obvious. Yesterday we were nerds. Today we're the cognitive elite. Let's conquer. - Chester G. Edwards





<!-- System Specs are to the Left -->
jbruneau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15th, 2006, 11:23 PM   #7
Site Staff
 

Posts: 11,449
CPU: Intel Core i7-965
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770
M/B: Intel DX58SO
RAM: Mixed
PSU: X-Spice 630w
Default

Vista is gonna be like XP. x86 and x64 Editions!
Regeneration is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 16th, 2006, 12:04 AM   #8
Edelweiss Corporal
 

Posts: 2,190
CPU: Celeron 2.53 ghz
GPU: LGA some shit
M/B: dunno dont care
RAM: Geil Ultra 1x1Gb
PSU: dunno
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbruneau
I'm not trying to start a flaming war here, just hear me out.

The 64bit version of the game DOES run slower, but that is because of the visual enhancements that have been added to the game over the 32bit version! All of these enhancements obviously tax the system much more . This applies true to all 64bit ready games, like: FarCry, HL2, Chronicles of Riddick, UnrealTournament 2006, etc.
Can be jbruneau , the author of this test was suprise to see that too.
Well i readed article (dont remember when , but it was linked here on NGO) about HL2 , and ther was no Image quality increase , and lil performance loss , it was not muth. And i was refering to this.


No flame war here mate , just exchange of opinion and knowegle.
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 16th, 2006, 12:35 AM   #9
Golden Member
 

Posts: 2,916
CPU: Q9450 + E8200
GPU: 3870x2 + 8800GTS
M/B: GA-X48-DS5 + Asus P5E
RAM: 4Gb S.T. + 4Gb OCZ
PSU: OCZ 700W + HIPER 580W
Send a message via Yahoo to gen.Rage1991hrv
Default

hi
i have tested vista os and i think the vista will be good in final version
desktop is great
yes it have a 3d desktop but its only runs beter and faster in vista 32bit version
i dont know why pc runs slower on all windows 64 bit systems maybe its becose is beta version or drivers beta
there is no normal 64bit drivers for any device
gen.Rage1991hrv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 16th, 2006, 01:03 AM   #10
Edelweiss Corporal
 

Posts: 2,190
CPU: Celeron 2.53 ghz
GPU: LGA some shit
M/B: dunno dont care
RAM: Geil Ultra 1x1Gb
PSU: dunno
Send a message via Yahoo to nCaine
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by generalRage1991hrv
hi
i have tested vista os and i think the vista will be good in final version
desktop is great
yes it have a 3d desktop but its only runs beter and faster in vista 32bit version
i dont know why pc runs slower on all windows 64 bit systems maybe its becose is beta version or drivers beta
there is no normal 64bit drivers for any device

So Rage , but was you able to test some game or bench on it , is it performing better the same , or worst ?????
__________________

-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------
nCaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Disclaimer - Top