Main Menu
» Home
» News
» Forums
» Articles
» Files
» Blogs
» Chat
» Search
» Register
» User CP
» Screenshots
» Disclaimer
» Submit News
» News Archive
» Contact Us
Follow Us
» Facebook
» Twitter
» Newsletter
» RSS Feed

Windows Vista: SP1 vs SP2 RC
Posted by Regeneration on February 6th, 2009, 10:00 AM

TweakTown has managed to get hold of a copy of Windows Vista SP2 RC (Release Candidate) from Microsoft and decided to put it through its paces against Vista SP1 to see if consumers can expect to see any performance improvements in the latest service pack for the struggling Vista operating system.

Release Candidate or RC simply means that it is a possible final version for Microsoft to release to the public sometime soon after. Many previews of the Vista SP2 BETA were published toward the end of last year, but this is build 6002.16659.090114-1728 – a newer release which is likely to yield some improvements.

Besides any possible performance improvements, service packs always include new OS features and usually a truck load of bug fixes and security updates.

We installed fresh installs of both Vista SP1 and SP2 on our test bed, installed all available updates from Windows Update for both operating systems and got to work benchmarking over the past couple of days. Our SP2 Ultimate install took up a total of about 14GB of HDD space, while SP1 is slightly slimmer at around 13GB.

You can read the entire article at TweakTown.

Last edited by Regeneration; February 6th, 2009 at 10:06 AM..

11 Comments
Booo! I smell a conspiracy.

Last edited by Regeneration; February 6th, 2009 at 10:05 AM..
Quote
I noticed the bolded word TweakTown and stopped reading.
Quote
I see nothing
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unixlord View Post
I noticed the bolded word TweakTown and stopped reading.
Why? what's wrong with TT?
Quote
Basically microsoft has found a way to make their spyware work with less resources.
Quote
This comparison is BS!!! Made the same test and saw NO performance hit on driver test´s, I used hdtune pro. I had the exact same results on both sp1 & sp2rc, and the RC was even better in one thing. I got the same MB/s results, but SP2RC used less cpu. SP1 used 5% cpu on both my hd tests (Raid0), on SP2RC it only used 2% on both hd´s. So do not read this test and believe all they say as it is not correct. The only way the get the same results as they got was if I did this? If i used the built in generic driver for my Intel raid chip, then YES you get much lower results. But if you use the latest Intel Matrix Storage driver 8.7.1.1001, youre results will be exactly the same on both OS´s. So either the TT guys made a big mistake and used generic drivers for the test´s, or they are only after to make some "headlines"?? You be the judge?
Quote
it might be something else
there is a known bug in W7 that misidentifies HDDs as solid state drives
I guess this it's happening to that test also because SP2 might have that same bug
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by zme-ul View Post
it might be something else
there is a known bug in W7 that misidentifies HDDs as solid state drives
I guess this it's happening to that test also because SP2 might have that same bug
How would that affect performance?? Not trying to flame or anything, seriously intrested?? I have both SSD/Sata drives, my 2 SSD in raid are superfast on both systems? So why would Windows thinking drivers are SSD lower performance?? Please if you can not answer, if you can please do tell?
Quote
Theres a Write caching bug in Windows 7. you gotta disable write caching for full speed.
Quote
yes, disable write cashing for normal HDDs
Quote
Well I can confirm that the write cache bug is NOT present in SP2 RC. Works just fine, I think the TT sp1 vs sp2 tester disabled the write cache setting tho, because with SSd drives you half the performance if Write Cache is disabled. But it does work on SP2 rc..

Last edited by HaZe303; February 10th, 2009 at 08:33 PM..
Quote

 

Quick Reply
Message:
Your Username: Click here to log in

Options
 





eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Disclaimer - Top