| | uhhhh it is large
thx for info | |
| |
| | Interesting that they are using 4 DDR chips per GPU as opposed to 8 on the single 4870.... they are obviously 128 MB rather than 64MB chips....leaves the door open for a future 1 GB 4870 card though. | |
| |
| | technogiant, im not sure how u just saw 4 ddr chips per gpu, there r ddr ram each side of the card which is 8 ddr chips per gpu = 16pcs total | |
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Unixlord Should beat 9800GX2. | it should but we have not seen any real performance from a single 4870
we can only guess | |
| | I'm counting 16 memory chips, 8 per side. There have been rumors that this card treats it's memory as a single frame buffer. | |
| | only time will tell.. but i hope and think that this card will kill nvidia's 280 | |
| | Interesting that they are using 4 DDR chips per GPU as opposed to 8 on the single 4870.... they are obviously 128 MB rather than 64MB chips....leaves the door open for a future 1 GB 4870 card though.
----------------
4 chips on the front, 4 on the back, 8 total per GPU | |
| | DUDES i really think you failled your maths at high school !
8 memory chips are dedicated for each cores...
SO 16 in total on the board
if we say it's an 1gb version
1024/16 = 64 mb chips
Edit: Nice black board
AND HELL WHY WE SEE THE LOGO OF AMD INSTEAD OF ATI  | |
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by IModAmd DUDES i really think you failled your maths at high school !
8 memory chips are dedicated for each cores...
SO 16 in total on the board
if we say it's an 1gb version
1024/16 = 64 mb chips
Edit: Nice black board
AND HELL WHY WE SEE THE LOGO OF AMD INSTEAD OF ATI  | Oh I see, sorry guys my mistake, never taken one of these apart, I thought the chips you can see on the back were just like seated in a hole in the pcb and sort of sticking through the pcb...if you see what I mean...my mistake...  | |
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by IModAmd
Edit: Nice black board
AND HELL WHY WE SEE THE LOGO OF AMD INSTEAD OF ATI  | I liked the red boards , they are a trade mark of ATi and yeah why the AMD logo instead of ATi ???? | |
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered I'm counting 16 memory chips, 8 per side. There have been rumors that this card treats it's memory as a single frame buffer. | I'm interested in what this means to the cards performance, I've read that this will cause it to be seen as a single gpu card by the system....it will be great if it has none of the shortcomings of crossfire.
I understand they are using a new connection chip to to this....so here's an idea....if this new cross linking chip does produce huge advantage by making crossfire invisible..then could they not put this chip onto a sort of pcb crossfire bridge to allow several graphics cards to be linked in crossfire which would be invisible to the system? |
Last edited by technogiant; June 30th, 2008 at 08:06 AM..
| Quote | | |
| | does this use ddr5 for the mem like the single gpu version? | |
| | As i can see on the picture yes
Here the infos of the R700
Technology : 55nm
Die Size : 256 nm
ROPS: 16
Shaders : 800 (Unified)
Pixel Fillrate : 12.0 GPixel/s
Memory Type : GDDR5
Memory Size : 1024 MB
Bus interface : PCI-E 2.0
Dx Support 10.1 SM 4.1
Texture Fillrate 24.0 GTextel/s
Bus Width : 256 Bytes
Bandwith : 57.6 GB/S
Initial GPU Clock : 750 Mhz
Initial Memory clock : 750 Mhz
Overclocked gpu : 900 Mhz
Overclocked memory : 900 Mhz
(score of gpu in 3dmark vantage : 12526 in CFx (2 cards))
(Total score X12515) |
Last edited by IModAmd; June 30th, 2008 at 04:08 PM..
| Quote | | |
| | ATI is AMD. I don't see any reason to whine about. | |
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by IModAmd AND HELL WHY WE SEE THE LOGO OF AMD INSTEAD OF ATI  | Because AMD owns ATi? Its not all that hard to work out. | |