Main Menu
» Home
» Articles
» Files
» Forums
» Blog
» News
» Search
» Register
» User CP
» Live Chat
» Newsletter
» Upload Image
» My Images
» Contact Us
» RSS Feed
» Submit News

Gigabyte: Asus Lied and Fooled Customers
Posted by Regeneration on May 16th, 2008, 05:34 PM

Last week Tom’s Hardware had the opportunity to sit down with Gigabyte’s technical team in Taiwan and discuss motherboards, energy efficiency and the competition. Gigabyte’s technical team wasted no time in jumping into charts, benchmarks and comparisons with its main competitor, Asus. Gigabyte’s technical manager spent time comparing several motherboards from both Gigabyte and Asus, specifically those that claim good power to performance efficiency ratios. When the slides were shown, the message from Gigabyte’s technical team was obvious: Asus outright lied about its performance figures.

According to Asus’ own documents, motherboards labeled with an EPU logo contain an "Asus Energy Processing Unit." Essentially, these motherboards are supposed to contain components designed specifically to lower power consumption and provide better electrical efficiency throughout — there’s really no logical "processor" involved. Asus claims that EPU motherboards can deliver up to 80.23-percent "power savings" from motherboards without EPU components.

You can read the entire article at Tom's Hardware.

Last edited by Regeneration; May 16th, 2008 at 05:40 PM.
Post a comment

5 Comments
the term "up to" should be their first clue that the high end is probably compaired to a old energy hog of a board, so really there was no lie and 58% is pretty damn good on avrage, im not suprised this load of BS came from tom's, whats with all the asus bashing lately?? just lost all respect for gigabyte
Quote
a chip that delivers low power consumption overall ... makes me wonder
Quote
You can even do this without this dumb chip rofl... only with windows XD
Quote
you mean with software that cuts power to your cpu when its idle and stuff? ive found thoes to be nothing but problems, a hardware solution would be much better
Quote
I used to have that kind of program back when I had my P5B motherboard. Ended taking them out because so far they have indeed been nothing but trouble. I much prefer to let AMD C&Q/Intel Speedstep do all the work.
Quote

 

Quick Reply
Message:
Your Username: Click here to log in

Options
 
ATI Radeon HD 4870 4850 3850 3870 2900 2600 NVIDIA GeForce 280 260 9800 9600 8800 8600 - NGOHQ.com





eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced - Template by ForumMonkeys
Powered by vBulletin from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Privacy Policy & Disclaimer - Top