Main Menu
» Home
» News
» Forums
» Articles
» Files
» Blogs
» Chat
» Search
» Register
» User CP
» Screenshots
» Disclaimer
» Submit News
» News Archive
» Contact Us
Follow Us
» Facebook
» Twitter
» Newsletter
» RSS Feed

Crysis Demo 'Very High' Settings Hack
Posted by Regeneration on October 29th, 2007, 06:57 PM

If you are stuck with a DirectX 9 GPU or you are too lazy to install Windows Vista, then here is a nice tweak for you. Apparently, you can enable some cool Crysis DirectX 10 features without having a DirectX 10 GPU, DirectX 10 or Windows Vista, all you have to do is to edit the configuration files inside Game\Config\CVarGroups. You have to modify all files and replace the Very High variables [4], with the high [3] variables. If you find it too hard, then I have done it for you, just download this file and extract it the CVarGroups directory and pick ‘High’ settings inside the game. Credit goes to LennyRhys for the great discovery.

Attached Files
File Type: zip Very High Tweak.zip (5.1 KB, 46164 views)

Last edited by Regeneration; October 29th, 2007 at 07:03 PM..

33 Comments
Thanks for the zip! I will try this tweak asap.
Quote
Nice again dx10...
I think i will back to xp...
Quote
Quote:
or you are too lazy to install Windows Vista,


Gonna check this out Cheers
Quote
thats great, i wonder how much m$ paid them to disable thoes settings in xp
Quote
Well,someone can post before / after screens and fps?
Quote
Yes mate here are some sreenshots. I use a 8800GTX with the latest forceware 169.02.

High Settings:


Very High Settings: god shafts


Very High Settings: more detailed ground


Very High Settings: underwater god shafts


very nice but the fps dropped to 11...
Quote
impressive
Quote
how big of a hit on the fps are you taking for very high mode?
Quote
Way to go guys!! YOU Rock!
Quote
I also posted this, http://www.ngohq.com/56579-post39.html 3 days ago ...

but, I'm gettin' to something fishy ... I'm not 110% sure but those modified setting will enable DX10 features, not DX9 ...
I look at some screens I made an compared to the screens taken by nv8xxx series users and they aren't the same visual effects

MS lied to us and Crytek has found a way to bring DX10 to XP

Last edited by zme-ul; October 31st, 2007 at 07:22 AM..
Quote
Now I'm afraid Crytek will try to lock the editable file so we can't do that again in the final game

Because that event is telling me that I definitely don't need vista
Quote
look at linkbacks great job guys keep up the good work
Quote
Completely murders my X1950Pro, though. High with medium objects and shadows is already a bit too intense.
Quote
they aren't DX10 effects, they are all Dx9 effects, they just are supposed to run better via Dx10.
Quote
as I stated above, the effects do not show exactly on my card as they're shown on 8xxx series cards
if they were DX9 effects they should
Quote
there is no actualy real reason why dx10 can only run on vista, them telling everyone that it can only work on vista is to force everyone to switch to vista so they can get your money, they propbably mayed these guys alot of money to disable thoes options in xp
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by zme-ul View Post
as I stated above, the effects do not show exactly on my card as they're shown on 8xxx series cards
if they were DX9 effects they should
the effects are slightly sharper in Dx10(Vista) but otherwise they are exactly the same between the 2, when setup properly.
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by blindartist View Post
how big of a hit on the fps are you taking for very high mode?
When running the CPU/GPU benchmarks that were provided with the demo, I was getting an average of ~32 FPS with everything set to "High" in Windows XP.

After changing all the settings to reflect "Very High" the benchmarks both reported an average of ~25 FPS.

Note: I had both motion blur and depth of field turned off, probably would have dropped another frame or two from motion blur. (r_motionblur 0 / r_depthoffield 0)

You can also set some things even higher than "Very High"!

Check out this guys "ultimate tweak guide", it's extremely worth-while and explains things you'd otherwise be clueless about. Also includes screenshots and a list of colour-coded & defined console commands (not to mention how to unlock your in-game console :P).

inCrysis Crysis Forums / Ultimate Tweak Guide! (images included)

Lotsa <3 from Aussie Joe
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by mda View Post
When running the CPU/GPU benchmarks that were provided with the demo, I was getting an average of ~32 FPS with everything set to "High" in Windows XP.

After changing all the settings to reflect "Very High" the benchmarks both reported an average of ~25 FPS.

Note: I had both motion blur and depth of field turned off, probably would have dropped another frame or two from motion blur. (r_motionblur 0 / r_depthoffield 0)

You can also set some things even higher than "Very High"!

Check out this guys "ultimate tweak guide", it's extremely worth-while and explains things you'd otherwise be clueless about. Also includes screenshots and a list of colour-coded & defined console commands (not to mention how to unlock your in-game console :P).

inCrysis Crysis Forums / Ultimate Tweak Guide! (images included)

Lotsa <3 from Aussie Joe
Thank you very much Joe, much appriciated.
Quote
Hi!

I did a remake of the Cvar files. Instead of just copying the high settings to [3] I also renamed old [3] to [2], old [2] to [1] and removed old [1]

This way what used to be:

High is Very High
(This is all the candy!)

Medium is High
(What used to be our highest setting is now activated when we choose medium)

Low is Medium
(It doesnt go any lower since there are only 3 steps in XP i had to get rid of low settings alltogether)

Before with the old cVars "hack" if I chose to lower some settings, I actually had to go two steps to medium (from very high) now since meduim corresponds to high it's only one step in that sense. There will of course be no Low settings, since they are now like the old medium, but I think anyone who uses thisk hack does not need to have anything set at low

Before we had 4 2 1 now we have 4 3 2 Which makes more sense.

Just like the original hack, I didn't touch the MotionBlur file which is set to 1 (Very High Would be 3)

Hope this works, I'm gonna try it now!
Best regards
Zac
mrgnome.wordpress.com

I haven't tried the files myself but I think this will work.

Edit:

It seems to work fine, these are screenshots taken at 1280*800 scaled to 50% and auto contrast corrected with Microsoft office image editor to sharpen them a bit.

This is Low (as standard Medium):


This is Medium (as standard High):


This is High (the tweaked mode Very High):


I Hope the pics work, I'm not sure how to use attachments like this...

This means that if you install these cvar files, just go back to the menu and select "Medium" settings and everything will be just as it was previously on "High", consequently setting something to "Low" will correspond to the old "Medium" setting.

I think you get the point

again, best regards
Zac
mrgnome.wordpress.com
Attached Thumbnails
Crysis Demo 'Very High' Settings Hack-newlow.jpg   Crysis Demo 'Very High' Settings Hack-newmedium.jpg   Crysis Demo 'Very High' Settings Hack-newhigh.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: zip MrGnome_Crysis_Hack_update.zip (5.8 KB, 21557 views)

Last edited by MrGnome; January 24th, 2008 at 11:17 PM.. Reason: Final Explanation
Quote
wow,niiiice one MrGnome @ welcome to NGOHQ forums!
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirill View Post
wow,niiiice one MrGnome @ welcome to NGOHQ forums!
Thanx I tried it out yesterday, and it's really good to be able to set some features back to what used to be high, (now medium after this hack), to gain some fps.

I'm glad to be here, thank you for the warm welcome!

I wrote a post about my new rig that I'm running this on, it's in my blog here. Great build for the money, extreme bang for the buck. Just as a friendly helper if someone thinks about upgrading to be able to play Crysis... For better FPS I actually have to run it at Medium (former High) Very high just doesn't cut it in critical situations.
Quote
From what i've seen...
8800gt is kinda faster than 3850/3870
is it true ?...
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirill View Post
From what i've seen...
8800gt is kinda faster than 3850/3870
is it true ?...
Yep I think it is, look at the 3850 test at Tomshardware. But It's also more expensive.
The HD 3850 Is at 2nd place according to Yougamers.com

Quote
First rule is dont trust ANYTHING you read at tom's hardware, he's got all sorts of spnsorship deals with nvidia and everything you read there is sure be biased bull***t

the 3850 is a bit slower then the 8800, the 3870 can hold it own, maybe a bit slower in certain cases but still a good card, both cards are good though

and yes, Welcome to NGO m8
Quote
Blindartist, thank you! Here are some other figures, not from Tom.
http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/472/10

They do tell another story. The 8800GT tested there is an overclocked version.
My Radeon 3850 (ASUS with big cooler, whisper quiet) runs stable and cool at 720/950

Last edited by MrGnome; January 25th, 2008 at 09:00 PM..
Quote
A warm welcome to NGOHQ.com MrGnome and you seem to know your sh*t

I always felt the HD38xx series would shine a bit more with better cooling. What exactly are you using for a cooler just curious as this is my new hobby
Quote
i dont know..
i think my next aim is 8800gt...and not 3850/3870...
Quote
If you dont want such a big hit in fps you can edit the autoexec.cfg file so that only some very high things are enabled. I enable the color filter, watershafts and sunshafts, and the POM. (A few more too I just cant remember). It keeps my fps high (30-50) and its basically very high settings, and I only have a $200 graphics card.
Quote
For the record: It's not that I'm lazy. And my card supports DX10. It's that I don't WANT to change to use-half-your-RAM-and-pay-Microsoft-loads-of-money-for-a-small-update Vista.
Quote
yeah!!... fps dropped to 11!! but I dont care about that much .. coz i;m not a hardcore gamer. at least i've used now the "VERY HIGH SETTINGS" tweak for DirectX 9.0c users like me...THANKS!!! btw i;m using a 9500GB 512Mb
Quote
the thing with vista is it demands big hardware to enjoy the features were xp is great and reliable. u can still dual-boot.
Quote
thanks dudes, champion effort =D
Quote

 

Quick Reply
Message:
Your Username: Click here to log in

Options
 






Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - אבטחת מידע - NGOHQ.net - Disclaimer - Top