Main Menu
» Home
» News
» Forums
» Articles
» Files
» Blogs
» Chat
» Search
» Register
» User CP
» Screenshots
» Disclaimer
» Submit News
» News Archive
» Contact Us
Follow Us
» Facebook
» Twitter
» Newsletter
» RSS Feed

Radeon HD 2900 XT Lacks UVD Video Acceleration @ Tech Report
Posted by Regeneration on May 26th, 2007, 02:01 AM

I've just learned something that compels me to publish a major correction to our review of the Radeon HD 2900 XT GPU. I got the clear, distinct impression from AMD's presentations, statements, and conversations with me at its Radeon HD press event that its new UVD video decode acceleration logic was present in its entire lineup of Radeon HD graphics chips, and I relayed that information to you in our review of the product, promising to follow up with tests of this feature at a later date.

True to my word, I set out yesterday to test HD video decode acceleration on a Radeon HD 2900 XT using an HD DVD drive and a version of PowerDVD supplied by AMD for such purposes. To my surprise, CPU utilization during playback on our Core 2 Extreme X6800 test system ran between 40 and 50%, well above what one would expect from a solution with full HD video decode acceleration.

Read More

Last edited by Regeneration; May 27th, 2007 at 07:42 AM..

5 Comments
Rank amateur's, im running HD content just fine on my card. Scott Wasson should clean his glases and RTFM.
Quote
Zandro has a HD2900XT! I bet Rege has a core2 hidden behind that 80484.
Quote
So AMD have been economical with the truth - its not like its the first time, and in a way I can see the reasoning with leaving HD acc. out of the 2900XT - a bit too loud, hot and power hungry for a media centre and anyone using this card you'd imagine would have a relativly powerful rig. However, ATI haven't been completely honest - but that wouldn't be the first time, would it
Quote
Neither has Intel, Nvidia, Asus, OCZ... No company is completely honest. What do you expect?
I say AMD needs a 45nm 2800xt/xtx which would be 256bit and smack the currently poor midrange selection from both competitors while being cool, quiet and energy efficient.
Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unixlord View Post
Neither has Intel, Nvidia, Asus, OCZ... No company is completely honest. What do you expect?
I say AMD needs a 45nm 2800xt/xtx which would be 256bit and smack the currently poor midrange selection from both competitors while being cool, quiet and energy efficient.
Completely agree with, but if ATI did release a card like the one you suggest it might be too 'good' and take sales from their own 2900XT. Also we know NV would reply in kind, maybe ATI are just being 'cute' and accepting the status quo - or maybe they've liased with NV and agreed general specs and price for this market segment
Quote

 

Quick Reply
Message:
Your Username: Click here to log in

Options
 





eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Disclaimer - Top