Go Back   NGOHQ.com / Hardware / Graphic Cards

Reply
 
Old September 26th, 2009, 07:28 PM   #171
Advanced Newbie

Posts: 40
CPU: Intel Q6600
GPU: Sapphire ATI HD4850
M/B: Foxconn P45A-S
RAM: Mushkin 2GB 1066MHz
PSU: PCP&C 610Watt
Send a message via AIM to Skyfallkavu Send a message via MSN to Skyfallkavu
Default

Wow, thats really dumb of EA/DICE then, I remember all the hype of the game being able to use Nvidia PhysX.
Skyfallkavu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2009, 03:21 PM   #172
Golden Member

Posts: 126
CPU: q9450
GPU: hd4870
M/B: regular s775 board
RAM: 4gb
PSU: 700w
Default

Finally i'm ready to release a public final versions of the project (x86 and x64) with a couple of fixes to make it simplier to install - thanks to all testers.

However, i think users should decide if i'll do it asap, or will wait for the next WHQL driver release from nvidia. Although they should be busy enough with GT300 release and its driver support, they might find time to add another checks and blocking mechanisms for PhysX, which will require more time to fix. That way 191.03 might remain the only "last working" driver for our mod.

What's your opinion?
GenL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2009, 04:13 PM   #173
Pat
Dedicated Member

Posts: 133
CPU: i7 920 @ 3.33GHz
GPU: HD4890+9800GT ECO
M/B: Rampage II Extreme
RAM: 3GB DDR3 1600MHz CL6
PSU: Tagan 600W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenL View Post
What's your opinion?
I think that you should wait for the next WHQL release or even for the first GT300 release because:
1) We can still use 181.71//185.62 driver with the latest PhysX 9.x software so there is not a single game that cannot be played with PhysX-on-GPU for now. 190.xx drivers have improved CUDA performance but it's not a huge increase.
2) Nvidia could introduce a new PhysX software package that could require DX11 drivers so if you release it now, we could not be able to install any newer PhysX software package.

My performace tests showed 29fps (185.62) vs 30,5fps (190.xx) in the Darkest of Days PhysX benchmark (highest settings, 1680x1050) so I think you should wait.
Pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2009, 04:38 PM   #174
Advanced Newbie

Posts: 40
CPU: Intel Q6600
GPU: Sapphire ATI HD4850
M/B: Foxconn P45A-S
RAM: Mushkin 2GB 1066MHz
PSU: PCP&C 610Watt
Send a message via AIM to Skyfallkavu Send a message via MSN to Skyfallkavu
Default

I don't think it will be long until the next WHQL release. I mean we've had the beta for three or four days now, doesn't WHQL usually release within a week or two of the beta?

Maybe we should wait.
Skyfallkavu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2009, 05:05 PM   #175
Golden Member

Posts: 126
CPU: q9450
GPU: hd4870
M/B: regular s775 board
RAM: 4gb
PSU: 700w
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat View Post
2) Nvidia could introduce a new PhysX software package that could require DX11 drivers
Good point, they already enabled DirectCompute for 8- and 9-series, but i can't imagine how they will ground DX11 requirement for PhysX, as it is still should be processed through CUDA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyfallkavu View Post
I mean we've had the beta for three or four days now, doesn't WHQL usually release within a week or two of the beta?
Actually 191.03 beta was released 2 days ago. Previous versions (190.64, 190.89, 191.00) were leaked AFAIK.
GenL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2009, 05:49 AM   #176
Advanced Newbie

Posts: 40
CPU: Intel Q6600
GPU: Sapphire ATI HD4850
M/B: Foxconn P45A-S
RAM: Mushkin 2GB 1066MHz
PSU: PCP&C 610Watt
Send a message via AIM to Skyfallkavu Send a message via MSN to Skyfallkavu
Default

I didnt have the exact day, that was off the top of my head.

I would wait until friday, and if its not out by then you should release it.
Skyfallkavu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2009, 01:49 PM   #177
Advanced Newbie

Posts: 39
CPU: i7 920
GPU: 5870 + 9600GT PhysX
M/B: Gigabyte EX-58 Extreme
RAM: 6Gb OCZ PC3-12800
PSU: Gigabyte Odin GT 800W
Default

Hi guys, I have been following this thread with great interest, I will borrow a 1Gb GTS 250 card from a friend (afaik it's a rebranded 9800GTX+) in a couple of days, I will test it using 185.68 drivers in my Windows 7 RC partition (64bit).

If PhysX performance is good for games (Mirror's Edge, Batman, Cryostasis...) with those old drivers, I would say to hold on releasing those "special" drivers, because nVidia could use them to put stronger anti-ATI measures in future drivers.

Any tester of those GenL's special drivers, have you done any game bench with PhysX games (Batman includes a benchmark) to see if there is any important performance gain comparing to 185.68?

GenL, thank you very much for your work, and congratulations

Last edited by LordJuanlo; September 28th, 2009 at 01:53 PM..
LordJuanlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2009, 05:29 PM   #178
Advanced Member
 

Posts: 90
CPU: Core2Duo E6750@3,20Ghz
GPU: HD4850+9800GT 4 PhysX
M/B: Asus P5KC
RAM: GSkill2x2GBDDR31333CL7
PSU: PowerCooler550WModular
Default

Hello!

I'm just finished reading the whole 18 pages of this thread. The discussion was really interesting, i'm even quote a couple of answers on a forum in my country where the debate continued, offcourse it became a campaign between NV vs ATi fanboys for time to time.

The reason why i'm posting here is because i own a 4850 and a 9500GT with an Asus P5KC. I was using both of them in XP, couldn't do it in Vista cause of the WDDM 1.0 and in my recently intalled Win7 64-bit i found this obstruction from NV when i tried to run PhysX on Batman (it runs on software mode).

In the last couple of pages i been reading about a patch. I wondering if is possible for me to test it?

Thanks you all for the incredible good work, specially the drivers modders.

PS: Sorry for my bad english, it's not my native lenguage.
__________________
Sorry for my bad english, not my native lenguage

Last edited by Rents; September 28th, 2009 at 10:43 PM..
Rents is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2009, 06:00 PM   #179
Golden Member

Posts: 126
CPU: q9450
GPU: hd4870
M/B: regular s775 board
RAM: 4gb
PSU: 700w
Default

Rents, check your pm.
GenL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2009, 06:19 PM   #180
Advanced Newbie

Posts: 39
CPU: i7 920
GPU: 5870 + 9600GT PhysX
M/B: Gigabyte EX-58 Extreme
RAM: 6Gb OCZ PC3-12800
PSU: Gigabyte Odin GT 800W
Default

Could I test it GenL?, I will get the GTS 250 in a couple of days and could provide performance numbers using full Batman game. Windows 7 64bit
LordJuanlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« PhysX for ATI | - »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 28 (2 members and 26 guests)
guillerodriguez, GenL
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off







eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Disclaimer - Top