ATI/Physx

**Regeneration** · August 27th, 2008, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lyla

I am actually a Software Engineer with a 1/1 degree with Honours.

Then you should already know how corporate bureaucracy and politics work. And you should also know that things are not always going as you planned – especially when it comes to software.

nCaine · August 27th, 2008, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lyla

It was pretty obvious the "this" was NOT "this PROJECT", get a grip.

Buhahahah You must be real desperate , probable constantly refreshing this page to see if ther is an update , or to have reason to post your bikering , funny angry kid you are ,

You just one penny form 9.99

Andry · August 27th, 2008, 01:32 PM

Does anyone have an idea about the date of release?

lyla · August 27th, 2008, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Regeneration

Then you should already know how corporate bureaucracy and politics work. And you should also know that things are not always going as you planned – especially when it comes to software.

Absolutely, what I dont understand is how most people posting here seem to miss the point. I am not complaining about the software not being released. As I said it could come next year, or never. It can remain your private software never to be publicly released. But, if you say you will give an update in "several hours", and don't you should apologise and give a new ETA on the update. Not just ignore that for weeks. It is called rescheduling due to project slip, and ofc a project like this can slip, but when you set a date or time to the "public" you become duty bound to at the very least when that date is reached, make a new one. Not just go quiet. You don't have to keep setting unrealistic dates you know.

Dwarden · August 27th, 2008, 03:14 PM

Regeneration may i ask what Your statement about 'you were told to delay' the release was about ?

was it related to AMD driver release, PhysX driver / SDK update, CUDA 2.0 driver/SDK update ?

i mean several months passed from first annoucement so it would be quite nice to know real status of the project put in some professional way

Andry · August 27th, 2008, 04:59 PM

By the way I looked it up in Google and some kind of forums, some people say "It is fake because it needs hardware support and ATI does not support. So it is imposible."...

Is this proccess true or fake? Isn't there any way to run PhysX on ATI? Did anyone see it by himself working?

Sorry about this kind of message but they confused me.

Spyral · August 27th, 2008, 05:05 PM

R.O.B.L.M.F.A.O @ ALL THE CRAP

PEOPLE MUST LEARN TO HAVE PATIENCE

lyla · August 27th, 2008, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spyral

R.O.B.L.M.F.A.O @ ALL THE CRAP

PEOPLE MUST LEARN TO HAVE PATIENCE

Wrong. It is about being told one thing then that not being followed through on with no explaination. Most people would not be bothered in the slightest if they were told that the release date for a beta of this is January next year. It has nothing to do with patience.

IModAmd · August 27th, 2008, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andry

By the way I looked it up in Google and some kind of forums, some people say "It is fake because it needs hardware support and ATI does not support. So it is imposible."...

Is this proccess true or fake? Isn't there any way to run PhysX on ATI? Did anyone see it by himself working?

Sorry about this kind of message but they confused me.

When Nvidia brought Physx the 8xxx series was released an long time ago.Now physx rendering are supported with thoses cards. All this stuff is just programming to redirect the physics creation/rendering to the gpu.So allowing more time to the CPU for do other stuff.You can go check the links i given in my previous post.

**Regeneration** · August 27th, 2008, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dwarden

Regeneration may i ask what Your statement about 'you were told to delay' the release was about ?

False promises by our "friends" and partners caused to this mess.