| |  | | | |
 | | 
August 16th, 2008, 04:33 PM
|
#21 | | Newbie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HcoolP  imm sure you can find your self some sort of occupation for next few days till the 20th cant be that hard can it | Why is the 20th significant? Quote:
Originally Posted by HcoolP besides the world wont crumble if REG's project wont take off.. | You're missing the point, and so is everyone else who says similar. | 
| | |
August 16th, 2008, 05:00 PM
|
#22 | | Loyal DAAMIT User
|
Indeed, we should at lease be aware of how far he is progressing in his projects.
__________________ AMD Athlon X2 6000+ -- ASUS M2A-VM -- Kingston KVR DDR2-800Mhz 4096mb -- Enermax FMA II 535w -- Antec Three Hundred Case -- Western Digital Caviar 120gb SATA -- Samsung SpinPoint 200gb SATA2 -- Sapphire Radeon HD3850 PCI-E -- ASUS Xonar DX PCI-E Sound Card -- 2x LG DVD 20x SATA Burners -- SilverStone FM122 HighFlow Side Panel Fan, 2x Antec Tricool LED front fans -- 1 top + 1 rear Antec Tricool Fans | |
| | |
August 17th, 2008, 12:00 AM
|
#23 | | Newbie
| | M/B: Gigabyte P35-DS4 Rev1 |
| | RAM: 2x2Gb A-Data @ 1080Mhz |
|
Here is my news.  
My 4870 rendered the image and an 8500GT calculated the physics. 
No accleration: 1212 oMark with 100% CPU load (only 1 core)
8500GT Physx: 2204 oMark with ~6% CPU load.
Last edited by janos666; August 17th, 2008 at 12:03 AM.
| |
| | |
August 17th, 2008, 02:23 AM
|
#24 | | Should I have an title?
| | M/B: Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6 |
| | RAM: 8GB OCZ AM2 DDR2-667 |
| | PSU: Antec EarthWatts 500W |
|
Ya fine benchmarks prove you did it... At this point in time, only 3DMark Vantage, Warmonger and three specially-enhanced maps in Unreal Tournament 3 support NVIDIA PhysX, and try as you may, you just cannot play 3DMark Vantage...
__________________ 
| |
| | |
August 17th, 2008, 07:04 PM
|
#25 | | Advanced Newbie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IModAmd Ya fine benchmarks prove you did it... At this point in time, only 3DMark Vantage, Warmonger and three specially-enhanced maps in Unreal Tournament 3 support NVIDIA PhysX, and try as you may, you just cannot play 3DMark Vantage... |
You do realise the poster above you is not showing anything to do with Radeon Physx. | |
| | |
August 17th, 2008, 10:27 PM
|
#26 | | Newbie
| | M/B: Gigabyte P35-DS4 Rev1 |
| | RAM: 2x2Gb A-Data @ 1080Mhz |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyla You do realise the poster above you is not showing anything to do with Radeon Physx. | I showed you a possible solution to get hardware accelerated Physx with a Radeon graphic card. Yes, my 4870 calculated only graphics but physics was calculated by a geforce card (and not by the CPU, see the CPU utilisation in the task manager).
A secundary cheap Geforce card would be better solution to get hadware accelerated Physx then a CUDA wrapper. A wrapper will be less compatible and it will be a little slower then a direct path. (Sorry if it is not true, I did not see any pre-release build from Regeneration yet, but I think so...)
Some Geforce owner would use a secundary geforce as a Physx card because it is faster then one card which do everything.
The only problem is that I can not run two different WDDM drivers on Vista (yet). | |
| | |
August 17th, 2008, 11:56 PM
|
#27 | | Should I have an title?
| | M/B: Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6 |
| | RAM: 8GB OCZ AM2 DDR2-667 |
| | PSU: Antec EarthWatts 500W |
|
Did you tryed the driver enforcement overrider of regeneration? Maybe it will work. Give it an try Quote: |
You do realise the poster above you is not showing anything to do with Radeon Physx.
| Did i mention it was about RADEON PHYSX ?!? Quote: |
Ya fine benchmarks prove you did it...(Do physics with the GF8500)
| Read corectly next time
__________________
| |
| | |
August 18th, 2008, 01:33 AM
|
#28 | | Advanced Newbie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IModAmd Did you tryed the driver enforcement overrider of regeneration? Maybe it will work. Give it an try
Did i mention it was about RADEON PHYSX ?!?
Read corectly next time |
Hey kid, perhaps next time you should have the bold bit in, instead of adding it after the fact and telling people they should read the text that wasnt there.
Everyone KNOWS you can use a geforce to act as the physics accelerator with the radeon doing graphics...however it is SO offtopic as to not belong here, and certainly not to have RETARDED "you proved you can do it" posts here. | |
| | |
August 18th, 2008, 12:46 PM
|
#29 | | Site Staff
|
Ok folks if this thread is gonna get personal then I will close it. If you want to stay on topic and not insult each other i will leave it open. I will keep an eye on how this one progresses | |
| | |
August 18th, 2008, 01:04 PM
|
#30 | | Superiordealer
| | GPU: Gigabyte nV 9600 GT OC |
|
I see some users are at NGO (just registeret) only for the physx , but since its not here , they loose they heads.
__________________ 
-----------------And if someone gave you a pile of gold, you'd probably complain that it was too heavy-------------------
Last edited by nCaine; August 18th, 2008 at 02:38 PM.
| 
| | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Rate This Thread | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
| ATI Radeon HD 4870 4850 3850 3870 2900 2600 NVIDIA GeForce 280 260 9800 9600 8800 8600 - NGOHQ.com
Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced - Template by ForumMonkeys
Powered by vBulletin from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0 | | |
