Go Back   NGOHQ.com / General / Games

Reply
 
Old March 26th, 2007, 12:13 AM   #21
Professional Member
 

Posts: 256
CPU: P4 3.4 GHz
GPU: GeForce 6800 ultra (mod)
M/B: INTEL D865PERL
RAM: 1Gb RAM
PSU: Seventeam 520W
Send a message via MSN to Amana
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirill
but its weird..
that tweak changing render
from dx9 to dx8
and here from
http://img524.imageshack.us/my.php?i...1293607yn4.jpg
to
http://img477.imageshack.us/my.php?i...2443357lq5.jpg

:|||||||||
Kirill, with a 6800 ultra AGP/256+P4 3.4+ 1G RAM I run it like above, getting more or less 90/100 fps:



1) How about trying, at the "user.ltx" file, modify the following lines, if they are in use:

r2_ls_bloom_fast ON to r2_ls_bloom_fast

also search for

r2_mblur 1 (or other number) and change to r2_mblur

2) maybe a 20% reduce on shadows helps also.

3) with your GPU, I believe you can use dinamic lightining with no problems...

4) are you using VISTA? I read about some issues with it...

How dark is your screen, you like it in this way?
__________________
When working toward the solution of a problem, it always helps if you know the answer.
Amana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2007, 12:21 AM   #22
Site Staff
 

Posts: 11,459
CPU: Intel Core i7-965
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770
M/B: Intel DX58SO
RAM: Mixed
PSU: X-Spice 630w
Default

Well, shoot me if you like, but I think STALKER sucks ass. The music is making me sleep, and shooting is not fun! It’s like you’re using some potato gun, and the Radiation is a pain in the arse. Should I mention the annoying bugs? I’m forced to use Static lighting because the developer is a moron, and ignores critical bug reports. Maybe I will give it another run again... sometime. I expected something better, but it seems that this game is extra-hyped.
Regeneration is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2007, 12:25 AM   #23
Golden Member
 

Posts: 1,251
CPU: Intel®Core™Quad Q9650
GPU: Sapphire HD4890 VaporX
M/B: ASUS P5Q Turbo
RAM: 4 GB
PSU: CoolerMaster 600W
Send a message via ICQ to Kirill Send a message via MSN to Kirill
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amana
Kirill, with a 6800 ultra AGP/256+P4 3.4+ 1G RAM I run it like above, getting more or less 90/100 fps:



1) How about trying, at the "user.ltx" file, modify the following lines, if they are in use:

r2_ls_bloom_fast ON to r2_ls_bloom_fast

also search for

r2_mblur 1 (or other number) and change to r2_mblur

2) maybe a 20% reduce on shadows helps also.

3) with your GPU, I believe you can use dinamic lightining with no problems...

4) are you using VISTA? I read about some issues with it...

How dark is your screen, you like it in this way?
hmm,i think that r2_ls_blood_fast is on off at my user.ltx
im not using vista,im on winxp..
and about darkness,i didnt really configured it,was busy with the settings and fps..
erm,i cant check now the game,im going to sleep here..
take a look at the attached file and try to run it at ur place with my settings..
i'll check ur settings tomorrow after i return home from the army..
Attached Files
File Type: rar user.rar (1.7 KB, 44 views)
__________________
Kirill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2007, 12:27 AM   #24
Golden Member
 

Posts: 1,251
CPU: Intel®Core™Quad Q9650
GPU: Sapphire HD4890 VaporX
M/B: ASUS P5Q Turbo
RAM: 4 GB
PSU: CoolerMaster 600W
Send a message via ICQ to Kirill Send a message via MSN to Kirill
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regeneration
Well, shoot me if you like, but I think STALKER sucks ass. The music is making me sleep, and shooting is not fun! It’s like you’re using some potato gun, and the Radiation is a pain in the arse. Should I mention the annoying bugs? I’m forced to use Static lighting because the developer is a moron, and ignores critical bug reports. Maybe I will give it another run again... sometime. I expected something better, but it seems that this game is extra-hyped.
well,totally agree with you..
maybe that game just need a patch or two...
__________________
Kirill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2007, 12:43 AM   #25
Professional Member
 

Posts: 270
CPU: Athlon 64 X2 4400+
GPU: PNY8800GTS 630/2.05GHz
M/B: ABIT KN8 SLI
RAM: 2GB G.Skill 2-3-2-5 T1
PSU: 750 Watt PowerTek
Send a message via AIM to kYdizzle
Default

well, so far i have not had any trouble with the game, works great so far.

radiation is only a problem until you either get the chemical suit or the SEVA suit(i found two in a stash) artifacts are fun to collect and sell, i keep all the rarest one for my own usage but sell the less effective to the barkeep and other stalkers

i think the game rocks, it would be better if you could play co op over a LAN because the Zone is very big.

only other complaint is the amount of stuff you can hold, only 50 kg? 60 if you don't run all over the place like i do. to bad the character don't get stronger over time.
__________________
Of all the smart people on this earth, i am one.

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/b823k/

Quotes are only as good as the credibility of the person who says them.

kYdizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2007, 02:19 AM   #26
Professional Member
 

Posts: 256
CPU: P4 3.4 GHz
GPU: GeForce 6800 ultra (mod)
M/B: INTEL D865PERL
RAM: 1Gb RAM
PSU: Seventeam 520W
Send a message via MSN to Amana
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regeneration
Well, shoot me if you like, but I think STALKER sucks ass. The music is making me sleep, and shooting is not fun! It’s like you’re using some potato gun, and the Radiation is a pain in the arse. Should I mention the annoying bugs? I’m forced to use Static lighting because the developer is a moron, and ignores critical bug reports. Maybe I will give it another run again... sometime. I expected something better, but it seems that this game is extra-hyped.
"What the hell stalker team did in past 5 years?

This game have been in development for 5 years if not more. I know that they had to change the game several times before they reached its current status. And who the hell did let that American idiot from THQ to ruin whole game?!!

Seriously in 5 years you'd expect the game to be more bigger, nicely polished in all aspects. Usually games should be already so-delivery stuff.

But this one ends up not worth it. So my question is...What the hell you people did in last 5 years?

Have you all been drinking Vodka all the crappy time!? Or what! I payed for this product 50 euros. And I really wanted to repsect you guys for delivering a quality game.

THe game is:
-The main story ends in 8 hours if not less. and whole game ends same time.
...." Read all here >>---> http://www.gsc-game.com/index.php?t=...ype=xr&lang=en (sorry, you have to open 'General' forum thread)
__________________
When working toward the solution of a problem, it always helps if you know the answer.
Amana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2007, 04:41 AM   #27
Stuck in "April 1st"

Posts: 3,199
CPU: Intel E8400
GPU: Geforce 8800GT
M/B: Asus Rampage Formula
RAM: G.Skill 2x2GB PI Black
PSU: PCP&C Silencer 750w
Default

Quoting wikipedia:
Quote:
Another common criticism is the fact that less than half of the map is actually accessible by the player, which is a far cry from the vast scale initially marketed as one of the game's strong points.
Quote:
The player may find the body of a scientist named "Gordon". His PDA contains some diary entries describing his journey into the zone. Mention is made of Black Mesa and a crowbar, obvious references to the Half-Life series.
__________________
IQ, when aggregated, follows Ohm's law.

Unixlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2007, 10:18 AM   #28
Member
 

Posts: 66
CPU: AMD X2 4200+
GPU: Club3D 8800GTS 320
M/B: ASUS A8R-MVP
RAM: 2GB DDR 400mhz Elixir
PSU: Levicom 450W Blue
Send a message via MSN to SiCk
Thumbs up

Well, despite some problems with the ilumination (i think that we must give at least 10fps more with the din. lighting, you need a very high-end pc to play with it) I think that the game is REALLY good.
The IA is great, one of the best. Is very very fun to fight against the enemies. They cover, help, run away, etc. I only saw a one or two errors, something normal, but much less errors and "irreal" situations than another games. All happens with logic and human (and no human) factions are very very credible.

The shooting system is also great. I think you must shoot at head, and the dispersion of the shoots are very good. If you don't like it at all, you can download a mod that increases ur weapons damage, but I think that actual is great, at least me shooting with ironsight at heads.
You must play it a bit, the first weapons are a bit bad, with great weapons the situation changes.

The best part is the ambience. You are in the zone and its dangerous (i'm playing at the highest difficult). You must not to make a long travel until its necesary or u have ammo and provisions. The history is great, the artifact and item system is very fun and i think that the developer team had tested many times the game (not graphics part, but the playable part, a lot).

The graphics are a mix up with the FEAR and Oblivion ones, and it has the best ilumintion system I had ever seen. Much better that FEAR ones (you must see the "undeground" levels) and the exteriors ambiance is incredible. The game needs a good pc, but is very scalable, you can play it perfectly on old pcs and you will get fun with it.

So, conclusions:
+ The history, the ambience and the "world /zone" that had been created
+ Item system and semi-rol aspects (conversations, trading, missions...)
+ Levels and ilumination
+ Very scalable (My brother play it on a 2700+, 1.5gb ram 333mhz, 9800 pro)

- Need of a good pc for enjoy the ilum. system
- The map would be great if it had a "Far Cry" system (no loads, no "access points").
- I think a patch to fix one or two IA problems and try to optimize a bit more the game.
__________________

Sorry for my english, I'm spanish talker!

Last edited by SiCk; March 26th, 2007 at 10:20 AM..
SiCk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 27th, 2007, 01:00 AM   #29
Professional Member
 

Posts: 256
CPU: P4 3.4 GHz
GPU: GeForce 6800 ultra (mod)
M/B: INTEL D865PERL
RAM: 1Gb RAM
PSU: Seventeam 520W
Send a message via MSN to Amana
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiCk

So, conclusions:
+ The history, the ambience and the "world /zone" that had been created
+ Item system and semi-rol aspects (conversations, trading, missions...)
+ Levels and ilumination
+ Very scalable (My brother play it on a 2700+, 1.5gb ram 333mhz, 9800 pro)

- Need of a good pc for enjoy the ilum. system
- The map would be great if it had a "Far Cry" system (no loads, no "access points").
- I think a patch to fix one or two IA problems and try to optimize a bit more the game.
At this moment, I can't say it better - it's my opinion also. Just in the beginning, I thought like Regeneration. But, as playing, and making fine adjusts - a great one was turning resolution to 1280x1024, other was turning basic quality settings to maximum - I started to like more and more the game. In the "cons" I must add the abrupt ending of the "walkable areas" - a simple straight line like ancient games, with a "radiation beep" telling you to go back or die. Now, I have to play a bit more, in order to see if I'll mantain this opinion, or....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirill
hmm,i think that r2_ls_blood_fast is on off at my user.ltx
im not using vista,im on winxp..
and about darkness,i didnt really configured it,was busy with the settings and fps..
erm,i cant check now the game,im going to sleep here..
take a look at the attached file and try to run it at ur place with my settings..
i'll check ur settings tomorrow after i return home from the army..
Tried your settings, there are only 6 differences - here:

MINE
hud_crosshair_dist off

r2_slight_fade 1.12

r__detail_density 0.38
r__geometry_lod 0.9
r__supersample 2
r__tf_aniso 1

YOURS
hud_crosshair_dist on

r2_slight_fade 0.6

r__detail_density 0.2
r__geometry_lod 1.
r__supersample 2
r__tf_aniso 16

As you can see, the major difference is the aniso - my system can't go anywhere with this setting (oh yeah: if I try - 0,00000000001 frame per second ); but with the rest of the settings, no problems at all, got 80/90 fps.
__________________
When working toward the solution of a problem, it always helps if you know the answer.
Amana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 27th, 2007, 12:42 PM   #30
Golden Member
 

Posts: 1,251
CPU: Intel®Core™Quad Q9650
GPU: Sapphire HD4890 VaporX
M/B: ASUS P5Q Turbo
RAM: 4 GB
PSU: CoolerMaster 600W
Send a message via ICQ to Kirill Send a message via MSN to Kirill
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amana
As you can see, the major difference is the aniso - my system can't go anywhere with this setting (oh yeah: if I try - 0,00000000001 frame per second ); but with the rest of the settings, no problems at all, got 80/90 fps.
the aniso thing is one of the filters,right?
well,with render 1 and maximum setting i got 120~130 fps...
__________________
Kirill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On







eXTReMe Tracker

Copyright © NGOHQ.com - All rights reserved
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium
without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.
Powered by vBadvanced and vBulletin from Jelsoft
Copyright © 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2

Contact Us - Archive - NGOHQ.com - NGOHQ.org - NGOHQ.net - Disclaimer - Top